Family & Relationships1 min ago
Disgraceful Guidance By Universities Uk
64 Answers
Universities UK have issued guidelines suggesting it is acceptable for gender segregation to be enforced in Universities within the UK - putting the "rights" of religious fundamentalists above gender equality.
This is appalling.
http://
This is appalling.
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by LazyGun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
If I have read it correctly, the scenario is that a speaker asks for segregated seating. The university can provide it so long as the seating for both genders is equal and NON SEGREGATED SEATING IS PROVIDED AS WELL, leaving the choice to the audience.
All a bit silly but nothing to get ones underwear in a bunch about.
All a bit silly but nothing to get ones underwear in a bunch about.
@Woofgang Nothing in the guidance I have seen offered by UUK suggests that an option for non-segregated seating is to be offered as well. Quite the contrary. Segregation should be allowed so long as it is side by side, if a speaker asks for the audience to be segregated.
You not find that much to be offende at, Woofgang, but I do.
You not find that much to be offende at, Woofgang, but I do.
Woof I watched a video from the last time this happened. People were directed to the separate areas. It was, in my opinion, quite intimidating and I don't think I would have spoken up about it if I were attending. I therefore assume that a muslim woman would toe the line without putting up too much of an argument.
I may of course be wrong.
I may of course be wrong.
The case study which counsel appears to have advised on resulted in an opinion which is full of other assumption s, of caveats , if you will: if this and if that condition applies then....
The main one is the premiss that the people attending all agree toi segregation. The trouble with that is that anyone who would like to hear the speaker, but who doesn't approve of segregation ,will be denied the opportunity of hearing the speaker. That cannot be in accordance with any university's principles; such meetings should be open to all. It would be otherwise if, for example, the university held meetings in the form of a synagogue service; there it is part of Jewish practice for men and women to be segregated; but I really can't see that happening. You can't declare a room a synagogue for a day, still less a mosque, I suspect.
The main one is the premiss that the people attending all agree toi segregation. The trouble with that is that anyone who would like to hear the speaker, but who doesn't approve of segregation ,will be denied the opportunity of hearing the speaker. That cannot be in accordance with any university's principles; such meetings should be open to all. It would be otherwise if, for example, the university held meetings in the form of a synagogue service; there it is part of Jewish practice for men and women to be segregated; but I really can't see that happening. You can't declare a room a synagogue for a day, still less a mosque, I suspect.
Incidentally, I don't regard the idea that there will be some non-segregated seating as any more than a lawyer's point. The reality is that if, as adumbrated, the speaker is of such religious conviction that he regards non-segregation as contrary to his beliefs , he won't speak. And if the majority of the potential audience thinks that way, they won't tolerate non-segregation, since it is offensive in their eyes. Thus they will either not attend or will make anyone bold enough to sit next to someone of the opposite sex unwelcome, or worse.
@Fred I still cannot find where UUK have stipulated that some non-segregated seating is offered. Not sure where Woofgang found that.
It is anachronistic to impose gender segregation in an institution like a university, in the UK. Prof. Laurence Krauss had the right idea when he found out that segregated seating was a requirement when he was invited to debate some mouthpiece or another from an Islamic society at London University. He refused to participate unless they re-ordered the seating.
It is anachronistic to impose gender segregation in an institution like a university, in the UK. Prof. Laurence Krauss had the right idea when he found out that segregated seating was a requirement when he was invited to debate some mouthpiece or another from an Islamic society at London University. He refused to participate unless they re-ordered the seating.
In a statement, UUK said: "The guidance was approved by senior legal counsel as properly reflecting the law. It is not prescriptive. Universities are independent institutions and will make decisions on a case by case basis.
"The guidance does not promote gender segregation. It includes a hypothetical case study involving an external speaker talking about his orthodox religious faith who had requested segregated seating areas for men and women.
"The case study considered the facts, the relevant law and the questions that the university should ask, and concluded that if neither women nor men were disadvantaged and a non-segregated seating area also provided, a university could decide it is appropriate to agree to the request.
"It is very hard to see any university agreeing to a request for segregation that was not voluntary and did not have the broad support of those attending. As the guidance explains, there may be many other reasons why a university might refuse a request for segregation."
"The guidance does not promote gender segregation. It includes a hypothetical case study involving an external speaker talking about his orthodox religious faith who had requested segregated seating areas for men and women.
"The case study considered the facts, the relevant law and the questions that the university should ask, and concluded that if neither women nor men were disadvantaged and a non-segregated seating area also provided, a university could decide it is appropriate to agree to the request.
"It is very hard to see any university agreeing to a request for segregation that was not voluntary and did not have the broad support of those attending. As the guidance explains, there may be many other reasons why a university might refuse a request for segregation."
I do not think simply offering a "non-segregated" area is sufficient, Woofgang. It still allows for gender segregation as a platitude to religious belief, and I think it unacceptable for external speakers and religious societies to attempt to impose their beliefs upon a country where genders are equal in law.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank3 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles12 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles26 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.