Editor's Blog8 mins ago
Quest For The Holy Foreskin
41 Answers
National Geographic Channel on Sunday ! See link below..
Whatever next ? lol lol
I have my own Theories as to where it might have gone, wondering if Goodlife or any other Aber can shed some light on this issue ! :-))
http:// natgeot v.com/u k/quest -for-th e-holy- foreski n
Whatever next ? lol lol
I have my own Theories as to where it might have gone, wondering if Goodlife or any other Aber can shed some light on this issue ! :-))
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by redman41. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I have no serious knowledge of the bible, but as I understand it, Jesus grew up regarded as a normal child, nothing special, it was an adult that he revealed himself as the Son Of God.
Therefore, as a child,his foreskin would have no more significance than any other baby boy born at that time - so how can it have been preserved as a relic?
Therefore, as a child,his foreskin would have no more significance than any other baby boy born at that time - so how can it have been preserved as a relic?
Yes Goodlife - a classic case of bad science
http:// blog.pr actical ethics. ox.ac.u k/2012/ 05/when -bad-sc ience-k ills-or -how-to -spread -aids/
That’s right: 60% is the relative reduction in infection rates, comparing two vanishingly small percentages: a bit of clever arithmetic that generates a big-seeming number, yet one which–without also reporting the absolute risk reduction alongside–seriously misrepresents the results of the study. The absolute decrease in HIV infection between the treatment and control groups in these experiments was a mere 1.31%, which is likely to have no appreciable effect at the demographic level.
http://
That’s right: 60% is the relative reduction in infection rates, comparing two vanishingly small percentages: a bit of clever arithmetic that generates a big-seeming number, yet one which–without also reporting the absolute risk reduction alongside–seriously misrepresents the results of the study. The absolute decrease in HIV infection between the treatment and control groups in these experiments was a mere 1.31%, which is likely to have no appreciable effect at the demographic level.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.