Birdie1971,
If we are to reach a reasonably rational conclusion then let's do it in stages eh?
I should be grateful if you would stop using the phrase "expaining to you". I do not need you to explain anything to me - in fact you have yet to give me any hard information in any of your posts, merely your opinions as to where you think you are right and I am wrong. I'm a grown reasonably well educated and intelligent man and I should appreciate being treated as such or at least being treated with civility.
Verbal protesting against horrendous crimes is of course right (statement of the obvious to any decent citizen).
However yours, mine and the UN's voices are useless against the Vatican who will ignore us all. Maybe, and this is the worse outcome, they will paper over a few cracks. Why the worse outcome? Because it will allow the heinous criminality to proceed as per usual while satisfying many that the probems are solved.
They and their ilk in the C of E will only respond to force.
By force I mean state criminality prosecutions and congregational peaceful uprising. I would now add exclusion of the so-called "Holy See" from the UN. This is a powerful role allowing the "Holy See" to enter debates, influence UN decisions and debates.
Guess how many debates have occurred over the crimes in question.
Yup, you got it - None!
I want action and the criminals punished (not namby-pamby reformed). In these and certain other crimes, I believe in the death penalty. And "yes", I would pull the leaver!
Hence I should be grateful if you would withdraw your rude description of my views as "absurd and defeatist!
I must, stop for now, but will end by repeating my earlier question in simple isolated terms: "As well as addressing the RC sexual and other crimes of cover-up, should the UN also challenge the C of E in similar manner?"
Please answer with a straight unqualified "yes" or "no" if you can bring yourself to utter an answer which I doubt.
Regards,
SIQ.