Film, Media & TV0 min ago
You‘Ve Killed Your Children. Not God. Not Your Church. You
31 Answers
This judges summary seems pretty accurate to me.
Couple sentenced to jailtime ( enough?) for the wholly preventable death of their son. Makes for grim reading, especially when you consider that the Church they are part of has not changed its views. One can imagine other preventable tragedies.
But not for members of this flock, no. This Pastor/Church preaches that "Satan tests through illness. God is a jealous God. Trust in medicine and doctors is idolatry. Only true faith in the divine power of God heals".
As for the Pastor, his main concern was that the other children in the family had been placed into care in "non-believers homes", and the reason for the childs death was because of a "spiritual lack" of the parents.
http:// www.pat heos.co m/blogs /friend lyathei st/2014 /02/19/ judge-s entence s-faith -healin g-kille rs-youv e-kille d-your- childre n-not-g od-not- religio us-devo tion-yo u/
Couple sentenced to jailtime ( enough?) for the wholly preventable death of their son. Makes for grim reading, especially when you consider that the Church they are part of has not changed its views. One can imagine other preventable tragedies.
But not for members of this flock, no. This Pastor/Church preaches that "Satan tests through illness. God is a jealous God. Trust in medicine and doctors is idolatry. Only true faith in the divine power of God heals".
As for the Pastor, his main concern was that the other children in the family had been placed into care in "non-believers homes", and the reason for the childs death was because of a "spiritual lack" of the parents.
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by LazyGun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hardly. Failing to prevent a death is not the same as causing one. Furthermore any action one hopes will work and doesn't can be subject to the same criticism, including conventional medicine. It seems to me the judge let their personal opinion hold sway instead of judging impartially. It's their job to way things up and sentence not use the opportunity to berate for their own satisfaction. That's Jeremy Kyle's job.
"....any action one hopes will work and doesn't can be subject to the same criticism, including conventional medicine."
Not at all. There are rational hopes that something can work and irrational ones. Conventional medicine does work very well -- indeed, that's why it's conventional! -- and faith-based medicine does not. Anyone who continues to rely solely on the power of prayer is almost certainly condemning whomever is in their care to an early grave.
Put even more bluntly, faith-healing isn't even doing anything. To call it an action is just utterly wrong. If you give someone a drug that works usually but doesn't in this case, at least you tried something. If you stand by and watch as your child wastes away and appeal to your God but otherwise do nothing, you've done nothing. No comparison whatsoever between the two.
Not at all. There are rational hopes that something can work and irrational ones. Conventional medicine does work very well -- indeed, that's why it's conventional! -- and faith-based medicine does not. Anyone who continues to rely solely on the power of prayer is almost certainly condemning whomever is in their care to an early grave.
Put even more bluntly, faith-healing isn't even doing anything. To call it an action is just utterly wrong. If you give someone a drug that works usually but doesn't in this case, at least you tried something. If you stand by and watch as your child wastes away and appeal to your God but otherwise do nothing, you've done nothing. No comparison whatsoever between the two.
Bloody hideous business. I wonder if there is a charge that could be brought against the pastor? I know this is America so laws different but if there was a similar thing in this country (and there has been and no doubt will be again), if there is a charge that could be aimed at pastor as well, kind of as an accomplice? I really don't know the answer but I do feel that they hold a responsibility too.
It's a step away from throwing a bound woman into a pond as a witch - if she floats she is a witch, and is hung, if she sinks, she is not a witch, but she drowns.
Never underestimate the power of humans to be subverted by influences that make them feel better about themselves and that is essentially what religion is.
As in these cases, a death simply confirms their belief because their faith was 'not strong enough' this time around.
Never underestimate the power of humans to be subverted by influences that make them feel better about themselves and that is essentially what religion is.
As in these cases, a death simply confirms their belief because their faith was 'not strong enough' this time around.
Anyone who promotes faith as a viable alternative to reason is equally culpable in the neglect which leads to these kinds of death. With the onset of reason, rationality, that which distinguishes us from the common ape has come to define us as a unique species that has come to rely on reason to maintain that distinction and to promote what has become our sole means of survival as a species. A vote for faith, (such as is entailed in a belief in 'god') is a vote of no confidence in our common humanity and a guilty verdict against those who abstain from reason.
Nowhere near long enough for basically a,double murder of their children. I agree totally with your title. I've found it frustrating before when people blame "Muslims", for instance, for the act of an individual. Religion is a feeble excuse, not a cause, and certainly not a reason for not thinking for yourself.
I agree with you Pixie. Having this kind of evangelical faith is dangerous to the health and wellbeing of you and your family.
And the difference between here and the US is one of scale and results; It was not so long ago that a group of Christian Scientists in Bath were reported to the ASA for claiming in adverts and in street marketing that prayer could heal cancer.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-20 95540/C hristia n-group -banned -claimi ng-heal s-sick- street- prayer- session s-outsi de-Bath -Abbey. html
And the difference between here and the US is one of scale and results; It was not so long ago that a group of Christian Scientists in Bath were reported to the ASA for claiming in adverts and in street marketing that prayer could heal cancer.
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.