Crosswords2 mins ago
Aliens On The Moon? Why Have We Never Returned Back To The Moon?
253 Answers
There are many many videos and information on this theory and it really blow my mind it seems the more deeper I go the more I find and the more that compels me to keep digging.
I think that this the real "rabbit hole" and needs investigating/explaining.
Apparently there are many cover ups/lies and misinformation being spread by the main space body with 4 letters.
What are you thoughts on alien bases on the dark side of the moon/u.f.o's being sighted on/around the moon and various other things which point to the face that we are not alone and many on earth know the truth and do not want to share with us?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Henrietta. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It is true that it would be impossible to sustain a conspiracy of silence for so long if it depended on bald denials. So in cases like Roswell they muddy the waters with talk of 'weather balloons'. They also commission writers such as Erich von Däniken to fantasise and bring the entire subject of Extra Terrestrials into disrepute.
The truth is out there.
The truth is out there.
bibblebub, //you are one of those that requires superstitious nonsense to make some limited sense of the world around you//
Not with you. How does my belief that alien life exists equate to superstition?
Jim/sandyRoe, you’re muddying the waters. Erich von Daniken’s theories examine the possibility that aliens visited the earth in the distant past, not that they are here or on the moon today. He hasn’t brought the subject into disrepute – but his critics, despite often never having studied his work in any detail, make every effort to discredit both him and his theories. I don’t agree with everything he says, but his fundamental premise is logical.
Not with you. How does my belief that alien life exists equate to superstition?
Jim/sandyRoe, you’re muddying the waters. Erich von Daniken’s theories examine the possibility that aliens visited the earth in the distant past, not that they are here or on the moon today. He hasn’t brought the subject into disrepute – but his critics, despite often never having studied his work in any detail, make every effort to discredit both him and his theories. I don’t agree with everything he says, but his fundamental premise is logical.
I didn't bring Erich von Daniken into this discussion. Still, despite what you say there is a link between the two different ideas. Aliens visiting us in the ancient past and aliens visiting us in the recent past/ present are about as likely as each other. Although granted aliens having a base on the invisible side of the moon is many times less likely than either of those!
Jim, No, you didn’t bring him into the conversation, but you were quick to add your disparaging two pennyworth.
//Although granted aliens having a base on the invisible side of the moon is many times less likely than either of those!//
A bold statement. How do you know?
Mikey, when it comes to people who have never studied him linking him to people like David Icke, his work is very much ‘here or there’. It’s all about the all important education that you're always so keen to promote. ;o)
//Although granted aliens having a base on the invisible side of the moon is many times less likely than either of those!//
A bold statement. How do you know?
Mikey, when it comes to people who have never studied him linking him to people like David Icke, his work is very much ‘here or there’. It’s all about the all important education that you're always so keen to promote. ;o)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.