How it Works0 min ago
Theism Atheism Agnosticism
28 Answers
There often seems to be a lot of confusion over such terms here on AB.
Just a few of my own thoughts (OK, ramblings)….
I myself would consider myself both atheist and agnostic. Agnostic because I am open to the (slim) possibility that God may exist but Atheist because our (or at least my own) *present* knowledge would exclude that possibility.
But also can all Atheists also be lumped together as some religionists are prone to do? Ive know Atheists who believe in survival after death (and why not?), Atheists who believe in aliens (and why not?) and Atheists with beliefs in paranormal abilities (and again, why not?) But atheism seems to be seen as a faith of its own, when its clearly not.
Aren't Christians atheists when it comes to the ancient Greek and Roman gods?
What about somebody whose a Pantheist....believing that everything that exists is God? Are they Theists or Atheists? (Yes I know, they are Pantheists, just wondering how the religious would interperate that).
What about Polytheists? Would the religious condemn Polytheists as much as they condemn atheists like Richard Dawkins? Why would there be only one God rather than many (if Deity existed at all).
Just a thought or two.
Thanks.
Just a few of my own thoughts (OK, ramblings)….
I myself would consider myself both atheist and agnostic. Agnostic because I am open to the (slim) possibility that God may exist but Atheist because our (or at least my own) *present* knowledge would exclude that possibility.
But also can all Atheists also be lumped together as some religionists are prone to do? Ive know Atheists who believe in survival after death (and why not?), Atheists who believe in aliens (and why not?) and Atheists with beliefs in paranormal abilities (and again, why not?) But atheism seems to be seen as a faith of its own, when its clearly not.
Aren't Christians atheists when it comes to the ancient Greek and Roman gods?
What about somebody whose a Pantheist....believing that everything that exists is God? Are they Theists or Atheists? (Yes I know, they are Pantheists, just wondering how the religious would interperate that).
What about Polytheists? Would the religious condemn Polytheists as much as they condemn atheists like Richard Dawkins? Why would there be only one God rather than many (if Deity existed at all).
Just a thought or two.
Thanks.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by nailit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I come from a very mingled religious background (Judaism, Catholicism and Paganism) and I feel most at home being agnostic as a result because all make equal sense or no sense depending on the day. I do like the spirituality of Paganism, the idea of the embodiment of the God and Goddess, spellcasting and ritual and that feels right, however culturally I feel quite Jewish and logically I ought to presume it's all a load of old flannel, yet I can't quite make that jump to rule it out entirely. for myself I try not to judge anyone's opinions because my own are so garbled even I don't know what I believe half of the time, so I pick and choose and mill about in a state of religious confusion :) x
Well but polytheists are religious....... I think most people who believe in some kind of religion, even those who evangelise (well maybe not satanists lol) don't condemn others because of what they believe or not....there's actually quite a lot in the New Testament about it....."judge not lest that ye be judged" and the story of the Good Samaritan come to immediately to mind; also the woman taken in adultery and Mary Magdalen washing Jesus' feet.....Also "Judgement is mine" saith the Lord "I will repay"
I have to confess that I don't know enough about the religious literature of other faiths to comment on them.
I have to confess that I don't know enough about the religious literature of other faiths to comment on them.
IMO one is one or the other. Seems to me many agnostics call themselves atheists, then try and fail to justify it. Either you have faith that a deity doesn't exist, or you accept you can not know. I suspect 'agnostic' sounds wishy-washy and 'atheist' cool and confident, so they claim the latter and then make out that the definitions are different.
Believing in different deities doesn't make you atheist. And why would anyone need more than one God, one source of everything ? Having a community of them sounds more like wishful thinking, more like a myth. If there's a whole group of them that sounds like powerful beings, but not Gods as I understand the term.
Believing in different deities doesn't make you atheist. And why would anyone need more than one God, one source of everything ? Having a community of them sounds more like wishful thinking, more like a myth. If there's a whole group of them that sounds like powerful beings, but not Gods as I understand the term.
.."judge not lest that ye be judged" or
mh krinete ina mh kriqhte
Matthew 7: 1 - oh sorry Maffew 7,1
There is quite a lot of lardy-dah on the internet on this one. - cleafly because all religions are exclusive - "if you arent one of us you will diiiiiiieee in hell!"
I will only say: if you look at the Greek there are two clauses and they differ by one letter
( judge / be judged)
This is a pericope and also an aramaism
and very likely to derive therefore from the first fifty years of the first century and be verbatim
and so the question arises - why bother to preserve these words and who said them ( in reality ) ?
"Judgement is mine" saith the Lord "I will repay"
is old testament
( above my pay grade ) so I cant comment
[well it makes a difference to the usual fare you get on AB innit]
mh krinete ina mh kriqhte
Matthew 7: 1 - oh sorry Maffew 7,1
There is quite a lot of lardy-dah on the internet on this one. - cleafly because all religions are exclusive - "if you arent one of us you will diiiiiiieee in hell!"
I will only say: if you look at the Greek there are two clauses and they differ by one letter
( judge / be judged)
This is a pericope and also an aramaism
and very likely to derive therefore from the first fifty years of the first century and be verbatim
and so the question arises - why bother to preserve these words and who said them ( in reality ) ?
"Judgement is mine" saith the Lord "I will repay"
is old testament
( above my pay grade ) so I cant comment
[well it makes a difference to the usual fare you get on AB innit]
Theland, “We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.” Richard Dawkins
PP. //agnostic - dont know - - - - - simples//
Wrong. Agnostic: the belief that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God.
Woofgang. Mary Magdalen. Propaganda has a lot to answer for.
PP. //agnostic - dont know - - - - - simples//
Wrong. Agnostic: the belief that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God.
Woofgang. Mary Magdalen. Propaganda has a lot to answer for.
As you can see there are a variety of meanings for the terms in question. These meanings have changed often throughout the time they have been in use and continue to change, often from one minute to the next. I suspect this is because they are religious terms and therefore have no intrinsic meaning on their own. Even so, they might not be entirely without merit when considering the intent of those employing them and their implications.
PP there are two tiny passages in the whole of the bible that sound to me as though a real person said them. One is the Judge not thing and the other is John 14.2
"2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you."
That "if it were not so I would have told you".....I mean ok the language is archaic but to me it sounds like what you would say to a friend when you are trying to get over to them the truth of what you are saying.
"2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you."
That "if it were not so I would have told you".....I mean ok the language is archaic but to me it sounds like what you would say to a friend when you are trying to get over to them the truth of what you are saying.
