Copleston And Russell

[Atheist]

You need not read the whole debate to appreciate the civilised, polite and rational approach to having a 'disagreement'. Almost up to AB standard!
https://philosophydungeon.weebly.com/argument-from-contingency.html#

[Old_Geezer]

Read what seemed a lot of it, then gave up. Most seems to be gibberish. One needs no reason for existence in the sense something or someone has an predetermined aim for everything, so there is no compelling reason to think that a need for a deity has been proven. Things could well, just be.

(Not the sort of thing you start to read and can't put down. More the sort if thing you wonder why you're reading, put it down, then don't seem to pick it up again.)

[Theland]

Very civilised.