Lighter, Science is progress - it's learning - and yet you say it hasn't a clue about when life on earth first evolved - but apparently you do. Right!
You only have to look at the past 50 years to know that we would be much poorer without scientific progress ,and try as you might to cling to antiquated dogma, you can't deny that. I'll bet you and your family are happy to take advantage of the progress of science when you're ill - or when you want to fly off on holiday. And yet the mere suggestion that we insignificant ants on this tiny speck on the edge of a minor galaxy in the vastness of space aren't the only beings in the universe gets your hackles up. What makes you think we're so special? A series of texts written in ancient times by superstitous men who didn't understand what they were seeing?
For once you are right - you're wrong about the discovery of planets outside our solar system. Here's a BBC link -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4501323.st m - which says that 130 planets have been discovered - and the website was last updated in 2005, so perhaps there are more now. Sorry, it's getting late and I couldn't be bothered to search for more up to date information, so this will have to suffice. Our technlogy is young yet, so like it or not, more will be discovered in the future.
I've been down the road of religion, and I've studied ancient documents for years, including the bible, with a completely open mind, without outside influence, and without reference to anyone else, which is probably more than can be said for you, and that's why I've come to the conclusion that the bible is an historical document rather than a religious one, so it does no good at all to quote biblical texts to me. It means absolutely nothing.
I don't know how the universe was created - and neither does anyone else, including you. Ther