ChatterBank2 mins ago
And then there was life....
4 Answers
Craig Ventner has applied for a patent on a method to create a life form from scratch
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6733797.st m
He created a virus from scratch 4 years ago but that's not strictly a living organism. Now it seems that he's on the verge of something a lot more sophisticated.
Would the creation of an artificial life form change anything for the worlds religions or would it be a case of "so what"?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6733797.st m
He created a virus from scratch 4 years ago but that's not strictly a living organism. Now it seems that he's on the verge of something a lot more sophisticated.
Would the creation of an artificial life form change anything for the worlds religions or would it be a case of "so what"?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't think it's justifiable to call it "life from scratch", Jake... the key phrase in the article clearly states "...Dr Venter's team intends to construct an organism with a "minimal genome" that can then be inserted into the shell of a bacterium.
By removing genes, one by one, from a bacterium called Mycoplasma genitalium they identified the minimum number of genes required for this particular organism to replicate, or reproduce, in its controlled environment."
So, taking genes from an existing bacterium down to the level where the bacterium can still (barely) replicate itself, inserting genes into other bacterium, thereby producing a hybrid, isn't, in my opinion, creating new life is it? In fact, it sounds suscpiciously similar to the gentically modified crops that have been developed for a number of years. These different crops (corn, wheat, etc.) have been modified by injecting various genes into the seed germs to produce crops that withstand drought or certain diseases. The public, for the most part, have reacted negatively to the consumption of such fare...
By removing genes, one by one, from a bacterium called Mycoplasma genitalium they identified the minimum number of genes required for this particular organism to replicate, or reproduce, in its controlled environment."
So, taking genes from an existing bacterium down to the level where the bacterium can still (barely) replicate itself, inserting genes into other bacterium, thereby producing a hybrid, isn't, in my opinion, creating new life is it? In fact, it sounds suscpiciously similar to the gentically modified crops that have been developed for a number of years. These different crops (corn, wheat, etc.) have been modified by injecting various genes into the seed germs to produce crops that withstand drought or certain diseases. The public, for the most part, have reacted negatively to the consumption of such fare...
OK the from scratch business is a bit too much but the point is that once you've stripped down the bacterium to the minimum set of genes for reproduction you have a basic vehicle that you can add new genes into - a geneticists Lego kit.
This could let us create microbes that absorb sunlight and excrete hydrogen for fuel or even human bone marrow to cure lukemia sufferers.
All the same the degree is beside the point, the basis of the question is whether life is something so special that if we created a life form that would be a major impact to religion?
After all it was less than 50 years from Crick and Watson to the first artificially created virus I'd not put money against it being done in another 50
By the way if you'd like a real laugh have a read here and see who called the first artifical virus (created by Eckard Wimmer) irresponsible
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/07_0 2/polio_create.shtml
This could let us create microbes that absorb sunlight and excrete hydrogen for fuel or even human bone marrow to cure lukemia sufferers.
All the same the degree is beside the point, the basis of the question is whether life is something so special that if we created a life form that would be a major impact to religion?
After all it was less than 50 years from Crick and Watson to the first artificially created virus I'd not put money against it being done in another 50
By the way if you'd like a real laugh have a read here and see who called the first artifical virus (created by Eckard Wimmer) irresponsible
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/07_0 2/polio_create.shtml