Technology1 min ago
Unsolicited Phone Calls
15 Answers
Does anyone know to whom the phone number 02389 560068 belongs, because by repeatedly phoning me offences are being committed under the Data Protection Act and I wish to make formal complaints to Ofcom and the Information Commissioner?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by manofnorfolk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It's not flagged on Who Called Me
http:// who-cal led.co. uk/Numb er/0238 9560068
It's a Southampton number - have you spoken to the caller?
http://
It's a Southampton number - have you spoken to the caller?
It's possible to inject a fake number into the system and I'd be prepared to bet that's what's happening in your case.
Firstly, UKPhoneInfo.com (which is usually reliable) lists '023 89' as 'designated', meaning that it's been put aside for future use:
https:/ /www.uk phonein fo.com/ 023-cod e-alloc ations
Secondly, I've just tried calling that number and the code isn't recognised as a valid one.
So the call is probably coming from an overseas scammer. (They frequently use fake numbers to make it look as if they're calling from the UK).
Firstly, UKPhoneInfo.com (which is usually reliable) lists '023 89' as 'designated', meaning that it's been put aside for future use:
https:/
Secondly, I've just tried calling that number and the code isn't recognised as a valid one.
So the call is probably coming from an overseas scammer. (They frequently use fake numbers to make it look as if they're calling from the UK).
Thank you , everyone, for sharing your experiences. It is an offence under the Data Protection Act if information obtained for a specific purpose is used for another unauthorised purpose. I have never provided my contact information to anyone for use in connection with these unsolicited calls. Therefore, if anyone has obtained that information without my consent and is using it, they are in breach of the Data Protection Act.
-- answer removed --