Quizzes & Puzzles79 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It wasn't ungentlemanly conduct for distracting the goalkeeper (because the ball was already well on its way into the net before the keeper could have seen his opponent's action).
It wasn't ungentlemanly conduct through 'excessive celebration', since the somersault only took a moment.
As Factor30 indicates, there's no rule against 'high feet', per se. (It's only 'dangerous play' which is against the rules).
So why would the player be booked?
It wasn't ungentlemanly conduct through 'excessive celebration', since the somersault only took a moment.
As Factor30 indicates, there's no rule against 'high feet', per se. (It's only 'dangerous play' which is against the rules).
So why would the player be booked?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.