Paul
Reference your question "Duncer, not looking to get political, although the question obviously has some political connotations... what's the general concensus on it being a combined Irish team? I've often wondered".
I certainly won't get politicial as I have a very low opinion of virtually all politicians, and anyway, I grew up with inbred political squabbling and was delighted to leave it all behind. However, discussion of this topic is virtually impossible without including politics to some degree, and I don't mean personal politics.
When Ireland split into two entities politically, so did the football associations, but rugby stayed as one and were supposed to alternate internationals between Belfast and Dublin, something that happened until the 1950's I believe. When playing in Belfast they used our anthem and flag, and the reciprocal was true in Dublin. However, since I can remember, this has not happened, and I greww up with a team playing in a foreign country under a foregin falg and with a foreign anthem, making me feel that my culture was undervalued, if not unwanted. It is because of this that I have always found it difficult to support them, even though I wanted to. This was exaccerbated when Ireland did play at Ravenhill in Belfast and we heard that several southern players would refuse if the "Queen" was playued or the Union Flag flown. "Ireland's call" (a well-meaning but awful Phil Coulter dirge), was introduced, but I still see the team as very much a republican entity that is more representative of the Republic of Ireland than Northern Ireland, irrespective of who plays. Sad, but that's my take on it. I have been to Murrayfield to support Ireland once, but the dire game and the price put me off as much as anything esle, and I stick to going to watch Ulster ever now and then, although that is not a political statement on my part by any means, it's just that they come to Scotland twice a year and it's a chance to catch up with other "exiles".