Donate SIGN UP

If you can't measure it objectively ...

Avatar Image
sunny-dave | 21:29 Mon 30th Jul 2012 | Sport
13 Answers
The Olympic Motto is Citius, Altius, Fortius (faster/higher/stronger) ... which implies that you should be able to accurately measure and/or objectively decide who has won. So athletics, swimming, boxing etc are obviously OK.

But what about activities which are wholly 'subjective' in their assessment of excellence?

I have no problem understanding the beauty and physicality of (say) the gymnastics - but is it truly an Olympic sport?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by sunny-dave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I can understand your views, but gymnastics were contested in Athens in 1896 - and have been ever since. However, I feel that the Equestrian events are not appropriate for the Olympics. The other 25 sports at London 2012 are purely human endeavours - not animals.
I don't think there are many sports that require more strength than our gynmasts on their various apparatus.

It would be easier of they didn't have to rely on a judges score I agree but it doesn't make it any less of a sport. Lets be honest, they are stronger and more athletic than the archers for example. (Nothing against archers, everyone in the games deserves to be there, I'm just using them in a defensive argument!)
Question Author
I wasn't picking on the gymnasts in particular - just happened to use them as an example.

I don't have a fixed view on this, just musing aloud really - and I wouldn't want anyone to be deprived of taking part in the Olympics
You seem to be confusing a motto with a set of rules.
Well muse away dave, but isn't boxing decided by points too?

Nothing subjective about any of the sports really once you know the scoring criteria.
I can see your point , dave . Subjective judgement will always have some personal element whereas you can't argue with a stopwatch or tape measure .
Question Author
Yes - boxing was a poor example - and a contentious one too I suspect.

As you say, if the scoring protocols are tight enough and the judges are impartial then the degree of subjectivity reduces quite considerably anyway.
Ballroom dancing wouldn't look out of place when compared to synchronised swimming and diving.
yes, gymnastics was a crucial part of early Olympics apparently - as was the poetry contributions..... by the way the motto for the Castle Olympics is different (see last MOFC), "Citius, Pronus, Fortius"
Then again there are 'sports' like horse dressage!

The points are awarded - as far as I can tell - on the grace and poise of horse and rider.

OK I acknowledge probably hours of preparation but a) Is this a sport? b) Isn't it simply subjective by the judges? and c) isnt 50% down to the animal?
-- answer removed --
chariot racing - fine
some ponce in a top hat on a horse that prances in slow motion - no
-- answer removed --

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

If you can't measure it objectively ...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.