Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Cricket World Cup - England V Bangla Desh
30 Answers
Spoilers follow ...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sunny-dave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The truth is out: England are not good enough. They actually had a go and were still found wanting
I hope Ireland can do it but I am not holding my breath We were extraordinarily lucky to beat Zimbabwe as their batsman was plainly not out when Mooney caught him touching the boundary. And somehow the replay either didn't see it or worse appeared not to bother rechecking. If I'd been supporting Zimbabwe I would have been furious
I hope Ireland can do it but I am not holding my breath We were extraordinarily lucky to beat Zimbabwe as their batsman was plainly not out when Mooney caught him touching the boundary. And somehow the replay either didn't see it or worse appeared not to bother rechecking. If I'd been supporting Zimbabwe I would have been furious
NJ
\\\\This competition is not cricket, it is "slog it and run" as is all limited over cricket up to and including the peak of that nonsense, the 20/20 farce. \\\
Yes..........maybe.
Test matches ..5 days.....County cricket ..3 days.
Cricket was dying around 20 years ago......money wasn't coming into the game and it was in danger of becoming an "elite sport" with little public interest..........like hockey or basketball perhaps.
Many people who enjoyed cricket but yearned for a result on the day were leaving the game...TV was offering money for an entertaining sport for the "masses."
What was to be done?
I was brought up with the "old fashioned" values of county and Test cricket, but limited overs have been a life saver for the game.
\\\\This competition is not cricket, it is "slog it and run" as is all limited over cricket up to and including the peak of that nonsense, the 20/20 farce. \\\
Yes..........maybe.
Test matches ..5 days.....County cricket ..3 days.
Cricket was dying around 20 years ago......money wasn't coming into the game and it was in danger of becoming an "elite sport" with little public interest..........like hockey or basketball perhaps.
Many people who enjoyed cricket but yearned for a result on the day were leaving the game...TV was offering money for an entertaining sport for the "masses."
What was to be done?
I was brought up with the "old fashioned" values of county and Test cricket, but limited overs have been a life saver for the game.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.