Home & Garden0 min ago
How Serious Is Ball Tampering In Cricket?
From the reaction to the Australian team’s tampering you would assume that it is a serious offence. However, according to the ICC Cricket Code of Conduct it is only a Level 2 offence. That puts it in the same category as obstruction and swearing at another player, and you wouldn’t see a captain resigning his post for either of those.
I am not condoning it, btw, just questioning whether there is an overreaction, or whether the offence should be raised to a different level in the code.
I am not condoning it, btw, just questioning whether there is an overreaction, or whether the offence should be raised to a different level in the code.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Garaman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Considering how important the state of the ball is, adding five penalty runs to the score is hardly an appropriate sanction in my view.
If a much higher number were added, seventy-five or a percentage of the runs scored so far for example, would reduce the temptation.
There is also the issue of wickets taken with the tampered ball which could mean a much lower score having been made.
Maybe a penalty based on a combination of runs scored and wickets taken is needed. Use a percentage of the runs scored and add twenty-five for each wicket taken.
If a much higher number were added, seventy-five or a percentage of the runs scored so far for example, would reduce the temptation.
There is also the issue of wickets taken with the tampered ball which could mean a much lower score having been made.
Maybe a penalty based on a combination of runs scored and wickets taken is needed. Use a percentage of the runs scored and add twenty-five for each wicket taken.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.