Home & Garden3 mins ago
England Croatia
127 Answers
Spoiler thread ...
... where are you watching?
I’m in an apartment in the Schwarzwald, with a tiny TV and a dodgy satellite signal - apparently the local Gasthof has decided there is no audience for its big screen ... the German commentary team on ZDF don’t look/sound full of joy either ...
... where are you watching?
I’m in an apartment in the Schwarzwald, with a tiny TV and a dodgy satellite signal - apparently the local Gasthof has decided there is no audience for its big screen ... the German commentary team on ZDF don’t look/sound full of joy either ...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sunny-dave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Croatia worked out at half-time that if they pressed forward then the England midfield simply had no idea of how to build possession - consequently all those balls back to Pickford and then long hopeful punts up the right-wing.
Southgate tried to change things for extra-time, but tired legs and lack of anyone to boss the centre of the field just gave the space to the Croatians - who exploited it very well.
Well done for reading the semis, and (as others have said) the nucleus of a good team to go forward - just find us a couple of attacking centre-halfs (if such a thing still exists).
Southgate tried to change things for extra-time, but tired legs and lack of anyone to boss the centre of the field just gave the space to the Croatians - who exploited it very well.
Well done for reading the semis, and (as others have said) the nucleus of a good team to go forward - just find us a couple of attacking centre-halfs (if such a thing still exists).
We played really well the first half, but paid for not taking our chances when we were dominating play. Looking to the future - keeper could be world class, defence could be superb, forward line isn’t great – Kane didn’t look as dangerous as he should and Rashford was less effective than Sterling - and the midfield just isn’t good enough.
I suppose it's a matter of opinion, TCL, but currently the lead stories on the Guardian's home page are Football, David Davis, Thai cave, and Trump visit. Only the football story is new; the rest are followups to days-old stories or in Trump's case a look forward to a story that hasn't happened yet.
The silly season is nigh.
The silly season is nigh.
>Is any football match (including those England games before to-night) really worthy of being the lead item on the night's main news programmes?
Well it has certainly been the most talked about topic at work recently. I'm told or asked "it's / is it coming home, sir?" or similar dozens of times times each day. I can't recall anyone raising Brexit or the Cabinet or the Trump visit.
Well it has certainly been the most talked about topic at work recently. I'm told or asked "it's / is it coming home, sir?" or similar dozens of times times each day. I can't recall anyone raising Brexit or the Cabinet or the Trump visit.
FF, on some days, the most popular topic at work might be the previous night's EastEnders or Corrie story but I doubt it would make the Ten O'clock News.
I agree the tournament is a major event but there was one England game where the BBC had it as the lead story and the second half had only just kicked off. How on earth can that be justified?
I agree the tournament is a major event but there was one England game where the BBC had it as the lead story and the second half had only just kicked off. How on earth can that be justified?