Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Brain Damage
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.roy - // Boxers by definition are not unintelligent.
How many boxers have you people with the tar brush met? //
I refer you to the last paragraph of my post at 17:05.
It's not a matter of academic intelligence, as advised, it is possible to be advanced in an academic sense and still possess and act upon psychopathic urges.
I believe that the urge to hurt someone else and call it a sport is fundamentally skewed as a way of thinking.
How many boxers have you people with the tar brush met? //
I refer you to the last paragraph of my post at 17:05.
It's not a matter of academic intelligence, as advised, it is possible to be advanced in an academic sense and still possess and act upon psychopathic urges.
I believe that the urge to hurt someone else and call it a sport is fundamentally skewed as a way of thinking.
AH: "Anyone, from an academic dunce to a university professor, who thinks that hurting other people constitutes sport has something missing in their mental wiring" - that's just another of your own evaluations for someone who does not have the same views as you on any given subject. I'm just pointing out that there have been intelligent boxers as measured, in the case of Nicky Piper, by Mensa. For example I think religious adherents are radio rental but I do accept that, inexplicably, some of them do have a high IQ. You do have a tendency to get on your high horse over people that do all manner of things that you find incomprehensible, that does not mean they are unintelligent.
TTT - // You do have a tendency to get on your high horse over people that do all manner of things that you find incomprehensible, that does not mean they are unintelligent. //
I agree - I think people who make jokes about domestic violence and serial killers are incomprehensible as well - but as I have already stated twice - sometimes behaviour and intelligence are not actually linked together.
I agree - I think people who make jokes about domestic violence and serial killers are incomprehensible as well - but as I have already stated twice - sometimes behaviour and intelligence are not actually linked together.
-- answer removed --
Mods aren't allowed to remove posts on threads they are involved in...
To get back to the thread, I think, ttt, you are only thinking of intelligence as being "academic", which isn't the case. There are lots of types, and at least eight that can be measured. So, it is quite possible for someone to have every degree on earth, while being "stupid" at other things.
To get back to the thread, I think, ttt, you are only thinking of intelligence as being "academic", which isn't the case. There are lots of types, and at least eight that can be measured. So, it is quite possible for someone to have every degree on earth, while being "stupid" at other things.
-- answer removed --
Who is that to, Roy? In my view, it is nothing to do with what other people do or don't like.... but suggesting anyone is "intelligent" because they have academic qualifications, is not the whole truth either.
You (I think), said that "by definition" they are not unintelligent. So, I was asking you about that definition?
You (I think), said that "by definition" they are not unintelligent. So, I was asking you about that definition?
roy - // So you're stupid if you do something that other people do not like? //
Back to the thread with an excellent example of the 'So' Rule!!!
No-one is suggesting that doing something that anyone does not like renders that person 'stupid'.
The argument is that boxing is not the behaviour of someone who has a sound definition of what is right and wrong about inflicting pain and possible lasting or terminal damage on another human being.
Intelligence - or absence thereof - does not come into it.
Back to the thread with an excellent example of the 'So' Rule!!!
No-one is suggesting that doing something that anyone does not like renders that person 'stupid'.
The argument is that boxing is not the behaviour of someone who has a sound definition of what is right and wrong about inflicting pain and possible lasting or terminal damage on another human being.
Intelligence - or absence thereof - does not come into it.