ChatterBank3 mins ago
Away goals rule.
Why does the away goal rule apply in extra time on the second game? I'm no Liverpool fan, but if they go out on that rule, then it's surely wrong! Liverpool didn't have an extra 30 minutes to score in Madrid, so why should the away team in the second leg have an advantage?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dabees. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
dabees,
UEFA's Article 7 explains it in this link:
http://www.uefa.com/newsfiles/19071.pdf
PS: The explanation does not address your main concern, i.e that you think it's "surely wrong". It's quite simple and to the point.
UEFA's Article 7 explains it in this link:
http://www.uefa.com/newsfiles/19071.pdf
PS: The explanation does not address your main concern, i.e that you think it's "surely wrong". It's quite simple and to the point.
I wonder if, statistically, the team that plays the second leg at home usually wins. It seems that way to me. Often a 1-0 defeat away is seen as a "good result", and a 2-1 defeat gives them an "excellent chance" ...
If that's the case (the team playing the second leg at home has an advantage), then it seems reasonable that if they can't win in 90 minutes that they then have a disadvantage going into extra time ...
If that's the case (the team playing the second leg at home has an advantage), then it seems reasonable that if they can't win in 90 minutes that they then have a disadvantage going into extra time ...
It's not always the away team in the second leg who have the 'advantage'. If a game was played at the ground of team A and the score was 1-1, and the second leg was played at the ground of team B and the score was 0-0 then team B would win on the away goals rule because they had scored at the ground of team A.