Donate SIGN UP

Actively Passive.

Avatar Image
gl556tr | 05:55 Tue 04th Oct 2022 | Technology
9 Answers
UK Ltd must urgently be active in supporting the construction of passive domestic, public and commercial buildings!
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by gl556tr. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes, if you say so!
is there some sort of link, or perhaps you can expand on this.
Ye but assume your going to focus first on china usa and India first...
indeed Bobb
Question Author
". . . assuming you are going to focus first on China, USA . . ." will never solve *our* massive waste of energy. The lack of standards on energy-saving buildings has resulted in, for instance, current heating not only warming the humans inside but the surrounding environment. The eye-watering electricity bills reflects this lack of positive, long-term planning.
It's the older buildings that need to be brought up to spec. Not always easy but much could be done.

It's ludicrous that listed buildings should be stuck with e.g. wood framed, single glazed windows just to maintain the "look".
Question Author
I wholeheartedly agree, Davebro, The older buildings must be brought up to spec. Grenfell Towers springs to mind. No example made here in rebuilding with state-of-the-art cladding and minimal-cost heating. On the contrary, one feels that the whole country is resigned to doing . . . well, nothing.
The planning system gives quite a bit of weight to protecting the character, appearance and historical value of old buildings. But that weight is meant to be balanced against other interests (which should include energy issues). In my view we are failing to give enough weight to the energy issues. It always struck me as odd that old windmills are considered worthy of protection, but that new windmill proposals (which have their own aesthetic) are often resisted.
Question Author
I agree with your view on 'old' buildings such as windmills, Atheist, which I would regard as ‘historical’. Don’t these latter generally have thicker walls? So, they require relatively little insulation, methinks. My impression is that those constructed in the past century are prime candidates for effective cladding. The resulting lower heating bills would be welcome for many.

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Actively Passive.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.