Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
For Mikey444 (And Others Who Value The English Language)
47 Answers
Mikey bemoaned the poor use of English by a single Tesco employee
( http://
but I wonder if anyone else here has noticed that every Morrison's store in the country has an 'employee' who doesn't know the difference between 'accepted' and 'excepted'?
I'm referring to the self-service tills where, when you scan your loyalty card, a recorded woman's voice helpfully tells you "Match and More Card excepted".
Grrr!!!
( http://
but I wonder if anyone else here has noticed that every Morrison's store in the country has an 'employee' who doesn't know the difference between 'accepted' and 'excepted'?
I'm referring to the self-service tills where, when you scan your loyalty card, a recorded woman's voice helpfully tells you "Match and More Card excepted".
Grrr!!!
Answers
There used to be a large A-frame sign outside the filling station in a now-extinct service area on the A40 near Monmouth, that proudly said :::: " All Major cards excepted ! " When I asked why they didn't take any cards at the station, it took me some time to explain. But months later, the sign was still there !
08:25 Wed 13th Jan 2016
With respect to the original post, I resent the suggestion that I don't value the English language based on, say, responses to Mikey's thread. The primary issue is that I don't see how it's appropriate to correct someone about their perceived misuse of English a) over a phone call when conducting official business and b) when it's dialectal English rather than actually wrong. It just doesn't seem to be the right situation to do so. The comparisons to arithmetic errors, meanwhile, are just misplaced. Mathematics is either right, or wrong -- and anyway the mistakes affect money, something far more tangible than an abstract "double negative" issue (not even an issue in many languages anyway). Language evolves, and what is "right" now was "wrong" even as recently as 50 years ago, and vice versa, so correction or hypercorrection comes across as dogma rather than helpful, friendly advice.
As far as I'm concerned now, the best way to deal with English "errors" is to look after your own use of the language, while in talking with other people, the only time to query their use of language is if you genuinely don't understand what they are saying or meaning. In Mikey's phone call, that didn't happen -- it was obvious what she meant -- so there was no ambiguity in meaning and therefore no need to try and correct anything.
In point of fact, most of the points of grammar people seek to correct aren't actually rules anyway -- just un-necessary dogma from an unhealthy 18th-century obsession with trying to make English the new Latin.
As far as I'm concerned now, the best way to deal with English "errors" is to look after your own use of the language, while in talking with other people, the only time to query their use of language is if you genuinely don't understand what they are saying or meaning. In Mikey's phone call, that didn't happen -- it was obvious what she meant -- so there was no ambiguity in meaning and therefore no need to try and correct anything.
In point of fact, most of the points of grammar people seek to correct aren't actually rules anyway -- just un-necessary dogma from an unhealthy 18th-century obsession with trying to make English the new Latin.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.