News1 min ago
Putin, A Poisoner?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It wasn't nine years. The inquest was held much later, then delayed, then restarted
Yes wouldn't Putin just love us to forget. This was a botched killing. It should have used a much stronger dose, which would have meant Litvinenko dying and being buried before any of this got out
I'm surprised the culprits haven't gone the same way.
Maybe some of them have
Yes wouldn't Putin just love us to forget. This was a botched killing. It should have used a much stronger dose, which would have meant Litvinenko dying and being buried before any of this got out
I'm surprised the culprits haven't gone the same way.
Maybe some of them have
It is very difficult to imagine that any ordinary Russian people would have access to such a chemical and the ability to travel and deliver it without the approval of Putin. Putin has ( or aspires to ) dictatorial powers, so anyone doing something so significant without his warrant would incur his most serious wrath. Or death.
Any by the way, the pronunciation is Pootin, not Pyutin.
Any by the way, the pronunciation is Pootin, not Pyutin.
-- answer removed --
Retro, I mean this kindly, so there is no need to shout at me, but there is no such construction in English as would of, could of, should of etc. What you mean is would've, could've, should've etc. These are abbreviations of would have, could have and should have. Just because they sound pretty much identical to the versions you use doesn't mean that these are options. Up to you, of course.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.