Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Seems incredible that the bit that prevents it crashing into pedestrians is an "optional extra".
Ouch, that looked nasty - it should be compulsory not an extra.
£2000 extra in 2013.
Wouldn't fancy trusting the Merc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzHM6PVTjXo
That was the bad old days in 2015. We're on the eve of a brave new world where this type of technology is to be fitted into convoys of trucks moving up to ten at a time, together, in a line, unbroken.
What could possibly go wrong?
So it wasn't the car at fault? It was the owner! oh dear ☺☺☺
I guess the owner went for the no option on the extra brain cells to drive a car safely.
Well I can see the viewpoint that some may not wish to pay extra for functionality that isn't necessary. Many will have enough brain cells to ensure no one is standing in the way. The speed of the car seems unsafe though. Folk should have time to move out of the way when it's clear they're in the path.

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Not Crashing Into People? Optioinal Extra Sunshine!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.