Film, Media & TV36 mins ago
Abandoned Japanese Boy: Seven-Year-Old Yamato Tanooka 'forgives Father'
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-asi a-36466 399
Glad to see that he looks none the worse for his ordeal here.
What a story he is going to have to tell in the playground !
Glad to see that he looks none the worse for his ordeal here.
What a story he is going to have to tell in the playground !
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think this is another example of sub-editors using emotive adjectives to spin a story into something it is not.
As I understand it, the parents put the child out of the car on a roadside and drove off about a hundred yards, in order to 'teach him a lesson'. When they turned back, he had disappeared.
I do not for one moment condone the parents' action in disciplining their child in this heavy-handed and frightening way - but what they did is a very long way away from 'abandoning him in a bear-infested forest' as the media spun it.
I am glad that it has ended happily for all concerned.
As I understand it, the parents put the child out of the car on a roadside and drove off about a hundred yards, in order to 'teach him a lesson'. When they turned back, he had disappeared.
I do not for one moment condone the parents' action in disciplining their child in this heavy-handed and frightening way - but what they did is a very long way away from 'abandoning him in a bear-infested forest' as the media spun it.
I am glad that it has ended happily for all concerned.
Ummm...this thread has all the hallmarks of turning into one our regular circular arguments.
I posted the BBC Link purely as a new point of information for us on here. And no, you certainly didn't say that the child was to blame....my mistake if I implied that you did....it wasn't my intention to do so !
I posted the BBC Link purely as a new point of information for us on here. And no, you certainly didn't say that the child was to blame....my mistake if I implied that you did....it wasn't my intention to do so !
Old_Geezer - //But he was abandoned, obviously. He was in one place, the parents went elsewhere; no matter how long they were intending to be away. Had the lad not been abandoned he wouldn't have got concerned and tried to find his own way out, and they would not have lost him. That is the whole issue. //
The press report I read advised that the parents drove about a hundred yards up the road - in other words, they remained in sight of their son, although they lost sight of him while the turned the car around and went back for him.
That is not the same as leaving him while they drive away, and then return some time later, as erroneous press reports have implied.
That scenario does not fit an accurate description of 'abandonment'.
The press report I read advised that the parents drove about a hundred yards up the road - in other words, they remained in sight of their son, although they lost sight of him while the turned the car around and went back for him.
That is not the same as leaving him while they drive away, and then return some time later, as erroneous press reports have implied.
That scenario does not fit an accurate description of 'abandonment'.
Old_Geezer - //But how is it not the same, albeit with less intent ? They drove away and lost sight of him. //
The word 'abandon' has very emotional connotations when used in a news story like this - which is why the papers used it.
To say - 'lost sight of for a matter of seconds ...' which is the truth, has nothing like the same attention-grabbing potential.
If the parents had driven off to the next town, had dinner, gone to the pictures, and booked into a hotel for the night, and then gone back to look for the child, then that would be abandonment, but, stubbornly, the far less evocative truth has not been allowed to get in the way of a good story.
The word 'abandon' has very emotional connotations when used in a news story like this - which is why the papers used it.
To say - 'lost sight of for a matter of seconds ...' which is the truth, has nothing like the same attention-grabbing potential.
If the parents had driven off to the next town, had dinner, gone to the pictures, and booked into a hotel for the night, and then gone back to look for the child, then that would be abandonment, but, stubbornly, the far less evocative truth has not been allowed to get in the way of a good story.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.