ChatterBank2 mins ago
South Yorkshire Police Spend £2.1M On Chief's Hillsborough Costs
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-south -yorksh ire-365 17918
Guess who is paying for the SYP's attempt to pervert the course of justice ?
Guess who is paying for the SYP's attempt to pervert the course of justice ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.we are
the chief is now an ex-chief isnt he ? removed by the crime commissioner for that area ?
Millions of public money has been wasted on a defence which was discredited, however it is difficult once you have given a budget to say to someone - "you cant run that defence"
as that is obviously unfair.
thre are mechanisms for barristers to say - "this is so stupid I am not pleading it" - but I dont think it was in that category.
they are after all going to get to paid ....
the chief is now an ex-chief isnt he ? removed by the crime commissioner for that area ?
Millions of public money has been wasted on a defence which was discredited, however it is difficult once you have given a budget to say to someone - "you cant run that defence"
as that is obviously unfair.
thre are mechanisms for barristers to say - "this is so stupid I am not pleading it" - but I dont think it was in that category.
they are after all going to get to paid ....
to be honest Mikey I dont think you have gone thro all 500 days of oral testimony
if they had admitted guilt - [werent they in fact acquitted ?] - this would have been brought to the courts attention as a (incontrovertible fact) 'fact'
( in an employment tribunal as a non lawyer i was told " dont go on with this it wont get you anywhere." )
I had thought that Teresa May had noticed the waste of funds in pleading the police case - but what does that mean in the end ? Uusally with an inconsistent or stupid defence ( or claim ) you rub your hands and think - " this is gonna be like mugging a kitten..."
if they had admitted guilt - [werent they in fact acquitted ?] - this would have been brought to the courts attention as a (incontrovertible fact) 'fact'
( in an employment tribunal as a non lawyer i was told " dont go on with this it wont get you anywhere." )
I had thought that Teresa May had noticed the waste of funds in pleading the police case - but what does that mean in the end ? Uusally with an inconsistent or stupid defence ( or claim ) you rub your hands and think - " this is gonna be like mugging a kitten..."
You cannot expect the police to not defend themselves. So there will be a cost for doing so for such a lengthy inquest.
The solicitors accuse the Chief Constable of lengthening procedings, but I do not buy that.
It is a waste of public money, but unfortunately there is a cost to having justice seen to be done.
The solicitors accuse the Chief Constable of lengthening procedings, but I do not buy that.
It is a waste of public money, but unfortunately there is a cost to having justice seen to be done.
Gromit....I most certainly can blame the SYP for defending themselves, when they lied at the first Inquest, and continued to lie for most of the second Inquest.
In addition to lying, they obfuscated and did their best to delay the proceedings for 27 years
Justice could easily have been done, and done considerably cheaper, if the SYP Police had been honest and above board right from the start, something which they quite clearly failed to do.
In addition to lying, they obfuscated and did their best to delay the proceedings for 27 years
Justice could easily have been done, and done considerably cheaper, if the SYP Police had been honest and above board right from the start, something which they quite clearly failed to do.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.