.... why does the BBC arrogantly presume there are enough licence payers to justify the enormous amount of money and airtime it devotes to the Edinburgh Fringe and Glastonbury.
And while I'm at it, is it fair that the BBC concentrates so much effort into 'Children in Need','Comic Relief' and 'Sport Relief' to the detriment of many hundreds of other worthwhile causes.
Glastonbury is never on BBC1 is it? (Usually BBC2, and the Red button.) I watch some of their Glastonbury coverage. I do switch off/over when the CIN/Comic relief stuff comes on though
Children In Need, Comic Relief and Sport Relief provide much needed employment for piano players with a talent for the melancholy-shifting-to-joy stylings so beloved of artless TV producers the world over.
As to the rest, they have to do something other than news and Eastenders, it may as well be the biggest arts festival in the world and loads of top musicians in one venue.
No. What I say is clearly true. i didn't say people want sport all the time.
Over the course of a year sport probably accounts for less than 5% of BBC's coverage.
Other channels are available.
//Do you think that ITV would seriously cover them ? ITV doesn't even cover the bloody Olympics ! //
no mikey, but that's because ITV don't hold the broadcasting rights, not because they believe it's more important to show repeats of "goldenballs".......
incidentally, the BBC won't be showing the olympics after the 2020 Tokyo games as the rights in Europe are now exclusively held by "Discovery".
By the way, it looks as if the Beeb were instrumental in starting Children in Need, Comic Relief, and Sport Relief, and I can see no reason why they shouldn't continue to provide the highly popular Telethons that raise such huge sums of money.