Religion & Spirituality3 mins ago
So Is It Now Its Racist To Do Impressions ?
Shouldn't they been concentrating on more important things.?
http:// www.exp ress.co .uk/new s/polit ics/716 855/Jer emy-Cor byn-Lab our-com edienne -Jan-Ra ven-Dia ne-Abbo tt-Pest on-on-S unday
Dave.
http://
Dave.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.But surely, Ms Abbott is being caricatured because she is a politician, not because she is black?
Politicians or all stripes take satire in good humour - it goes with the job - and I am sure Ms Abbott is unlikely to be thin-skinned enough to be offended about the copying of her voice.
As for the colour of her skin - that doesn't come into it.
Jim Davidson doing 'Chalky' - racist (although of its time to be fair).
Jan Ravens doing 'Diane Abbott' - not racist.
I think that's pretty much summed it up.
Politicians or all stripes take satire in good humour - it goes with the job - and I am sure Ms Abbott is unlikely to be thin-skinned enough to be offended about the copying of her voice.
As for the colour of her skin - that doesn't come into it.
Jim Davidson doing 'Chalky' - racist (although of its time to be fair).
Jan Ravens doing 'Diane Abbott' - not racist.
I think that's pretty much summed it up.
Talbot - //Jim Davidson doing 'Chalky' - racist (although of its time to be fair).
Chalky was fictional //
True, but it was a caricature of a stereotypical black man.
// A better comparison would have been Lenny Henry. //
Possibly - although it's tricky for a black man to caricature a black man.
That does lead to the argument that 'It's not racist if black people do it ...' which is not an argument that I especially side with, but that's a separate debate.
Chalky was fictional //
True, but it was a caricature of a stereotypical black man.
// A better comparison would have been Lenny Henry. //
Possibly - although it's tricky for a black man to caricature a black man.
That does lead to the argument that 'It's not racist if black people do it ...' which is not an argument that I especially side with, but that's a separate debate.
In the new age of internet democracy, everyone has a say. So it is not difficult to find stupid people tweeting rubbish.
In this instance, out of the millions who watched the programme, they have found half a dozen tweets and made up an anti-Corbyn story from it.
Do the opinions of this handful of loonies matter? - No.
Do these loonies have any influence? - No.
Do they fairly represent the opinions of the show's viewers? - No
To take this desperate waste of time garbage as real news is a mistake. To think it proves anything about Corbyn, black people, racism or the Labour Party is an insult to most people's intelligence. ^sadly, many are taken in by it.
In this instance, out of the millions who watched the programme, they have found half a dozen tweets and made up an anti-Corbyn story from it.
Do the opinions of this handful of loonies matter? - No.
Do these loonies have any influence? - No.
Do they fairly represent the opinions of the show's viewers? - No
To take this desperate waste of time garbage as real news is a mistake. To think it proves anything about Corbyn, black people, racism or the Labour Party is an insult to most people's intelligence. ^sadly, many are taken in by it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.