Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
No Protesters, No Petitions Against This Person's Visit, Why?
58 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
If any of you actually read the link, he is defending a CIVIL claim
( which he says is 'totally false')taken against him by two ex members of his dance troupe !!
Not even a suggestion of a criminal offence or police involvement.
I don't suppose the colour of his skin has any bearing on your condemnation of him AOG?
Yet another example of the Daily Wail reporting a non story in a manner intended to cause outrage and racial tension!
( which he says is 'totally false')taken against him by two ex members of his dance troupe !!
Not even a suggestion of a criminal offence or police involvement.
I don't suppose the colour of his skin has any bearing on your condemnation of him AOG?
Yet another example of the Daily Wail reporting a non story in a manner intended to cause outrage and racial tension!
-- answer removed --
Yes naomi has mentioned her belief in Ghosts more than once on AB.
I think the theory is that there are 'parallel universes' all existing at the same time and place. A ghost is when something happens that means an object or person from a parallel universe becomes temporarily detectable to us in this universe.
I think the theory is that there are 'parallel universes' all existing at the same time and place. A ghost is when something happens that means an object or person from a parallel universe becomes temporarily detectable to us in this universe.
-- answer removed --
AOG - //Strange how the anti-Trump brigade haven't also condemned this guy's sexual accusations. //
Why is it strange?
Just because people want to call out President Trump on his appalling behaviour towards women does not automatically sign them up for responsibility to monitor every other man on the planet who may cross your radar, and then react accordingly.
If this gentleman is accused properly, beyond rumour and a civil action, or he appears on film making lewd comments about parts of the female anatomy, or I actually know who he is, then I will be delighted to comment.
Until then, he was utterly unknown to me before you flagged him up, and as such, is not yet worthy of attention or comment.
Why is it strange?
Just because people want to call out President Trump on his appalling behaviour towards women does not automatically sign them up for responsibility to monitor every other man on the planet who may cross your radar, and then react accordingly.
If this gentleman is accused properly, beyond rumour and a civil action, or he appears on film making lewd comments about parts of the female anatomy, or I actually know who he is, then I will be delighted to comment.
Until then, he was utterly unknown to me before you flagged him up, and as such, is not yet worthy of attention or comment.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.