http://www.bbc.com/news/election-2017-39942573
The people voted brexit, Parliament backed it overwhelmingly, the PM has issued A50. So why is Tim nice but dim talking about another brexit referendum?
It is called blurring the lines 3T, a fudge, another route for the entitled to maintain their governance over what the rest of us want, whilst making it look as if it is in our best interests and nothing to do with their desire to steer the agenda as always. We have tolerated the insidious "we know best attitude" of the few for long enough but have seen through the...
"Could it be that some are worried it would be a vote to remain?"
No not at all.
It's simply that in the UK (bar the exceptional case of Ms Sturgeon's Scotland - aka La-La-Land) we tend to abide by decisions made by the electorate under the rules that governed whatever poll they were taking part in. We don't continually revisit the question until the "right" answer is returned. That's what the EU does and that's among the reasons why so many people voted to rid it of any influence over the UK's affairs.
I happen to believe that if a second vote was to be held today the result would be similar, or even more in favour of leaving. The EU has probably added a percent or two to the Remain vote by some of its remarks in the run up to the negotiations. Fortunately what I believe in that respect does not matter.
The Corby; //If it is a certainty that folk want to leave the EU, would a second referendum not confirm that? // yes, and according to the polls it would appear that the result would emphatically say so, and if that was a fact, would you then want to have a third and then a fourth and ......... ?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.