In his answer to Mikey, is Khandro suggesting that all you have to do to become religious is to read lots more about religion than you already have ? Over several decades, I have read and studied widely and deeply about all sorts of religions and all sorts of unbelief, in books, debates, lectures and many other sources. In doing all this study, I was actually looking for faith, but I wanted evidence before I could put away my unbelief. Some sort of proof. And how much did I find ? Absolutely zero, nil, nihil, nichevo, rien. Is Khandro suggesting I should study even more, that religious conviction may yet strike me ? I'm afraid it is always a cheap riposte from a religious person to a non-religious one. " You don't know enough about it " When does he suggest the time will come when I might have read enough about religion to say "that's it, now I can call myself an unbeliever" ?