News2 mins ago
Once Again Riots And Carnage On The Streets Of London, When Are These People Going To Learn?
14 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Playing devils advocate, the police are quick to say that the post mortom reveals that he did he did not die of a broken neck and that there was no evidence of violence and then go on to say that they think he died from a drug overdose that he may have taken?
Well if there has been a post mortem they would know what he died of!
Also why the extreme force when stopping him for a routine traffic stop? CS spray – was that really necessary?
There is more to this story!
Well if there has been a post mortem they would know what he died of!
Also why the extreme force when stopping him for a routine traffic stop? CS spray – was that really necessary?
There is more to this story!
Islay: Not right. The coppers said there were drugs in his system. They didn't say they were the cause of death. They also didn't say there was sufficient quantity to cause death, which is somewhat different. Also the case that different quantities and different types of drugs react differently, depending on the time period they were ingested, pre-existing medical conditions, whether the drugs concerned were 'diluted' and many other factors including whether he'd vomitted and, if so, when. It really is not as simple as you seem to be saying.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.