Home & Garden1 min ago
Grand Parents Arrange Gbh On Their Grandson......
53 Answers
http:// www.bbc .com/ne ws/uk-e ngland- notting hamshir e-40420 511
Yep it's another belter from the religion of peace.
Yep it's another belter from the religion of peace.
Answers
No child should be subjected to mutilation for religious reasons. When they reached the age of 18 they could decide if they wanted this procedure done. I doubt if many would.
09:19 Thu 29th Jun 2017
// Dr Balvinder Mehat of the Bakersfield Medical Centre in Nottingham carried out the procedure on the baby boy while he was in the care of his father, who is separated from the mother. //
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/home- news/mo ther-ta kes-gp- court-p rivate- prosecu tion-no ttingha mshire- circumc ision-b aby-boy -withou t-permi ssion-a 7736761 .html
It seems clear that the Grand parents had the consent of the father, so they did not go behind his back. The mother had not given permission, so to carry out the mutilation was wrong, but more a technicality.
Thousands of male babies are mutilated every week because both parents consent, but apparently that is OK with you.
http://
It seems clear that the Grand parents had the consent of the father, so they did not go behind his back. The mother had not given permission, so to carry out the mutilation was wrong, but more a technicality.
Thousands of male babies are mutilated every week because both parents consent, but apparently that is OK with you.
// Which bit was the decent journalism, Anne? //
I assume the Independent report that I linked to.
// OK with who, Gromit? //
The consensus seems to be that if the mutalation is done by a Rabbi with the consent of both parents, then there is nothing wrong. But if a muslim doctor does it with only one of the parents' consent, then it is barbarism.
It is barbaric irrespective of which religion does the attack on a defenceless baby.
I assume the Independent report that I linked to.
// OK with who, Gromit? //
The consensus seems to be that if the mutalation is done by a Rabbi with the consent of both parents, then there is nothing wrong. But if a muslim doctor does it with only one of the parents' consent, then it is barbarism.
It is barbaric irrespective of which religion does the attack on a defenceless baby.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.