Body & Soul5 mins ago
O.j Simpson Parole
O.J Simpson Parole on now Sky News listening to all the statements making him out to be a Saint, nine years for armed robbery and assault he just wants time to spend with his family he's done his time etc ! I'm sure his wife Nicole's family would loved to have spent more time with her! Result soon
Answers
the guy is an expletive deleted. Oh, yes, he's a saint all right, one who was sentenced after being found guilty of armed robbery. The trial showed that the glove actually fitted him this time around.
19:49 Thu 20th Jul 2017
He's a bad boy through and through, lucky he got to come out.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-47 10666/O J-Simps on-caug ht-mast urbatin g-cell- impact- parole. html
http://
There were $millions awarded against him in the Civil Suit for Nicole and Ron's death.
At that time he claimed, and showed, that he had few assets which could raise the amount awarded.
Since he was charged and imprisoned for 'stealing back his own belongings' (his words) those admitted possessions should be seized and sold to service this payment. And perhaps at regular intervals anything he has purchased with his $20,000 monthly pension ought to be seized and sold, too.
At that time he claimed, and showed, that he had few assets which could raise the amount awarded.
Since he was charged and imprisoned for 'stealing back his own belongings' (his words) those admitted possessions should be seized and sold to service this payment. And perhaps at regular intervals anything he has purchased with his $20,000 monthly pension ought to be seized and sold, too.
// they say crime doesn't pay, but his has, his late wife's family must be gutted he's out.//
I think the wifes family sued the arriss off him in the civil court
so crime deffo does pay !
He was in the slammer for "taking back what was his"
the problem being that it was not his anymore it was someone elses
I think the wifes family sued the arriss off him in the civil court
so crime deffo does pay !
He was in the slammer for "taking back what was his"
the problem being that it was not his anymore it was someone elses