andy-hughes�s apologetic reply illustrates perfectly the ridiculous situation we find ourselves in today.
Here we have, on the face of it, a perfectly sensible question raised about the use of a word that clearly offends some people. In posing and answering that question it is quite obvious that the word may well need to be reproduced. In making his reply, andy found it convenient to use the word. The context in which it was used is obvious to all concerned, and it was not used so as to be offensive or insolent to anybody. And yet, andy felt the need to apologise because the word had not been edited out as he expected.
So here are some facts:
- The word has been used as a derogatory and offensive term.
- This was recognised and any such use is now discouraged.
- Nonetheless, the word still exists and it cannot be �airbrushed� out of history by replacing it with asterisks. If you are to question its history and current use, it must be used.
Just when will people understand that words in themselves are not offensive? It is the manner and context in which they are used that makes them so. My point is perfectly made by the fact that some black people now use the word �nigger� as a term of endearment (something, I must say, I only learned today). God Save Us from this claptrap.