Katie Says, Reject The Narrative.

[Khandro]

What say you?

[dannyk13]

Who she?

[naomi24]

I've watched it. A lot of truth there - no doubt uncomfortable for some.

[emmie]

i watched it and there is a lot of truth in there, she has at least been to many of the places we wouldn't dream of going and talked to the people involved. Been hurt in the process so its not all hot air.

[anotheoldgit]

Gromit

/// Like a Daily Mail article, I jumped to the end. ///

How can you regularly criticise the Mail or it's content, as you do, if you never read their articles?

[Gromit]

AOG

// How can you regularly criticise the Mail or it's content, as you do, if you never read their articles? //

I will read the full article if it is worth it, but I can normally tell after the first couple of paragraphs that the DM is holding something back. That something is usually a fact that rubbishes their own story. They tuck that in the last paragraph, knowing that DM readers also don’t read all the article.
Often is the time you ask a question linked to a Daily Mail story, and your question is answered in your own link, (indicating you haven’t read much past the headline).

[sp1814]

Khandro

See what I mean.

A twenty four minute lecture is just expecting too much from AB members.

It would’ve been great if you could’ve provided some bulletpoints to form the framework for debate, in the same way that others do when posting about newspaper stories.

However, with a long clip like this, all anyone can really do is reply (after watching the whole thing), “I agree with her”, or “I think she makes some valid points” or “I reject what she’s saying”.

But, that’s not a debate. It’s a pill.

[sp1814]

*poll.

[naomi24]

^A pill might help. ;o)

[ichkeria]

Katie Hopkins says "Get furious" (apparently)
Paulo Gerbaudo at a Labour election rally says
"My answer is hate ... make the left hate again"
I say: a plague on both (there -- now they've got me at it !)