Donate SIGN UP

Mots

Avatar Image
EcclesCake | 15:11 Sun 07th Jan 2018 | ChatterBank
41 Answers
No doubt there has been a thread about this back in the day.

Is it not a tad irresponsible for the Govt to declare that cars over a certain age no longer require MOTs? Yes, super, responsible owners can elect to still have an MOT but what about all the rest?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 41 of 41rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by EcclesCake. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think owning a more "vintage" car requires more care and is less likely to be mistreated by the owner, if you look at the MOT history database on some newer vehicles when the car has its first MOT it fails on pure neglect items such as bald tyres, wiper blades fraying, worn brakes, no screen wash fluid. When someone decides to take on a vintage car it almost certainly means ongoing work is required to keep it ticking over and its more likely to be bought by an enthusiast rather than someone who wants to go from A to B

41 to 41 of 41rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Mots

Answer Question >>