Good Riddance

[Spicerack]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43101434

No doubt the pervert will be back when the coast is clear.

[-Talbot-]

No, he didn't.

[pixie374]

That's what i mean, jackdaw. To sue someone for libel, you have to prove they are lying. The burden of proof is on the accuser.

[Spicerack]

No. I thought I recognised the 'style'. Can't say, might get done for libel.

[Khandro]

Gromit; [ Trump said ] //“You can grab them [women] by the pussy”.

Your parenthesis is incorrect, he did not in any way mean or imply all women, he was referring to a small group of hookers and camp followers at a particular venue and what he said was (presumably) true.

[Togo]

One by one the "gods" of the luvvies are revealed to have feet of clay. Meehh.

[Gromit]

// I bet the Republicans are regretting putting that ghastly racist, boorish, ignorant, boastful and lying pervert forward //

Being ghastly, boorish, ignorant and boastful are not crimes. Even Lying is not criminal if it is not under oath.

Racist and pervert require proof. A recording of the man himself saying “You can grab them by the pussy” appears to be proof. He has not denied the recording is genuine, so we must assume the words really are his, so we are able to form an opinion (based on fact).

[Gromit]

Khandro,
You write lies.
Trump was not talking about hookers. Read the Washington Posts’ original story and then tell me his comments were not a general comment on the advantages of fame and wealth.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-recorded-having-extremely-lewd-conversation-about-women-in-2005/2016/10/07/3b9ce776-8cb4-11e6-bf8a-3d26847eeed4_story.html?postshare=3561475870579757&utm_term=.91a49d2f7138

[ichkeria]

In Mr Cox's case, what is the perversion involved, or are we not allowed to ask?

[-Talbot-]

I do acknowledge and understand that during my time at Save the Children I made mistakes and behaved in a way that caused some women hurt and offence.

"This was never malicious but it was certainly inappropriate.



Maybe these women (not 'woman') should be the ones to decide if his actions were malicious?


Don't forget this is a man who thought he was (well I'm not sure what he was thinking)important enough to do a 'alternative Christmas message'
How much moral fibre do you think you have to do that?
Also, don't forget he was also married.

[-Talbot-]

ichkeria
In Mr Cox's case, what is the perversion involved, or are we not allowed to ask?


You can find it if you really want to.

Anyway, I haven't got any more time to spend with sex-pest apologists. Ikea is calling :0/

[ichkeria]

One man's pervert is another man's urotherapy patient I guess :-)

Is there a bold website out there dishing dirt?

[ichkeria]

I can't find it: any hints?
Are animals involved?

[Garaman]

//A sex pest to me is a sex pest. Whether they are left thinking or right thinking matters not.//

I agree with Talbot. However, I just can’t for the life of me imagine Spicerack opening with the same OP if he had been right thinking, so maybe it does matter to some.

[Spicerack]

I'd imagine if you wrote it you'd want to give him a medal.
^There, that shows exactly how some people think. ;-)

[Garaman]

I condemn him as a sex pest, Spicerack, whatever his politics.

[mikey4444]

I can't find any evidence that this man is a pervert. He appears to have behaved inappropriately towards some women, but we have no details.

But Trump did use those words attributed to him and yet there are people on here that think he is marvelous !

[mikey4444]

Compare the prompt resignation of Cox, to the long drawn out way in which Damian Green was eventually sacked.

[Togo]

Ta Spice.

https://thumbsnap.com/i/AT4NY697.jpg