Crosswords0 min ago
Why Were The Japanese So Cruel To Their Prisoners In World War Two?
I know that in a war situation no side is blameless. But how the Japanese, who seem such a calm, respectful people, were capable of such appalling actions seems incomprehensible.
Answers
(See my answer has, in part, been anticipated. My comment in full: Just naturally[i more cruel (a theory I've seen proposed one of AB's long-term moderators)? Or a different understandin g of what constitutes martial dignity and honour? If your Bushido ethic tells you that it is your duty to fight for your emperor god and [i]never] surrender, then you will...
23:04 Sat 17th Feb 2018
Others have answered this question in a more than adequate way. I remember the 'game show' to which andy-hughes refers. I watched it once and could not comprehend how the torture they inflicted could be seen as in any way amusing. I had the same reaction in Germany, mid-1960s, when on a school exchange. I looked at a comic which had reduced the younger bothers of my 'exchange' to helpless laughter - the story was horribly cruel.
So all I will add is that when I lived in France I knew, fairly well, a chap who had been serving in Singapore when it fell. His descriptions of the fear of the Japanese and of some of the things which happened were horrific. If all he had had to hand was a golf club if he saw a Japanese - he would have wielded it with lethal intent. Went to his 90th birthday party, don't know if he's still with us, email didn't answer.
So all I will add is that when I lived in France I knew, fairly well, a chap who had been serving in Singapore when it fell. His descriptions of the fear of the Japanese and of some of the things which happened were horrific. If all he had had to hand was a golf club if he saw a Japanese - he would have wielded it with lethal intent. Went to his 90th birthday party, don't know if he's still with us, email didn't answer.
London and Covernty werent fire bombed
whether or not they tried
the allies after Hamburg spent lots on how to start a fire storm and couldnt really ( at will)
they concluded that it depended on incendiaries and explosive but the city lay out and material used were also determinants that could not be controlled.
Tokyo on 9 Mar 1945 got 1-2 kilotons
and this I thought exceeded all the bombs dropped on London during the blitz.
20 sq mi razed and up to 100 000 dead
whether or not they tried
the allies after Hamburg spent lots on how to start a fire storm and couldnt really ( at will)
they concluded that it depended on incendiaries and explosive but the city lay out and material used were also determinants that could not be controlled.
Tokyo on 9 Mar 1945 got 1-2 kilotons
and this I thought exceeded all the bombs dropped on London during the blitz.
20 sq mi razed and up to 100 000 dead
yes tony
technical terms which may not have their normal meaning
Hamburg the nature of the fires sucked oxygen out of the area and the population in cellars suffocated, and winds reached 60 mph. wooden structures burst into flames ( heat radiation I would have thought ) -
which as you can imagine wasnt caused by one fire bomb
not every incendiary causes a firestorm altho erm it may cause a fire.....
technical terms which may not have their normal meaning
Hamburg the nature of the fires sucked oxygen out of the area and the population in cellars suffocated, and winds reached 60 mph. wooden structures burst into flames ( heat radiation I would have thought ) -
which as you can imagine wasnt caused by one fire bomb
not every incendiary causes a firestorm altho erm it may cause a fire.....
Andy. You wrote “I think there is a genetic propensity towards what we regard as 'cruelty is the Japanese psyche.”
What’s happened to you?
Your answers have always been moderate, reasonable, thoughtful, and yet here you are apparently plugging a racist line.
What next? War-mongering Germans? Simple Irish?
Utter rubbish, Andy, and shame on you.
What’s happened to you?
Your answers have always been moderate, reasonable, thoughtful, and yet here you are apparently plugging a racist line.
What next? War-mongering Germans? Simple Irish?
Utter rubbish, Andy, and shame on you.
bainbrig - // Andy. You wrote “I think there is a genetic propensity towards what we regard as 'cruelty is the Japanese psyche.”
What’s happened to you?
Your answers have always been moderate, reasonable, thoughtful, and yet here you are apparently plugging a racist line.
What next? War-mongering Germans? Simple Irish?
Utter rubbish, Andy, and shame on you. //
I am sorry to read that my post upsets you so much.
I am certainly no racist, and I do not think that attributing character traits to nationalities qualifies me as one.
I have given examples to underpin my view, and I stand by it, and I do not feel any shame for it.
If you think I should, then we must agree to differ.
What’s happened to you?
Your answers have always been moderate, reasonable, thoughtful, and yet here you are apparently plugging a racist line.
What next? War-mongering Germans? Simple Irish?
Utter rubbish, Andy, and shame on you. //
I am sorry to read that my post upsets you so much.
I am certainly no racist, and I do not think that attributing character traits to nationalities qualifies me as one.
I have given examples to underpin my view, and I stand by it, and I do not feel any shame for it.
If you think I should, then we must agree to differ.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.