Starmer And The Southpost Triple...
News3 mins ago
Wheelie Bin Damage
A road with no path had a bin left at the boundary which was approx 300 mm ont the road when passing at the same time as on coming traffic impact was unavoidable I believe the council should not have enforced there boundary collection rule but collected from within the boundary
To avoid the risk of this kind of incident any thoughts
To avoid the risk of this kind of incident any thoughts
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Kes300. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I support the consensus. You should be driving at speeds appropriate to the conditions and available information on potential hazards.
But to be fair to the OP, there was surface water and the incident took place around dawn.
This is probably the worst conditions. A good driver would compensate for the increased danger by driving slower.
Although the highway code gives a stopping distance of 40ft for dry conditions at 20 mph, the reality is that tyre/road grip is less good in the wet.
A rough rule of thumb would be to double the stopping distance (thinking distance remains the same), so overall stopping distance should have been around 60ft (18m).
The OP says the hazard was around 50m beyond the blind bend.
This should have given ample time to slow down or stop in a safe and controlled manner, even with a tailgater behind.
Unless the actual speed was closer to 30mph, in which case the theoretical stopping distance in the wet would be around 40m.
To achieve that deceleration, one would really have to hit the brakes quite hard, and yes, there might be a risk of a tail-gating driver failing to respond in time, possibly resulting in a rear-end impact.
In fact, the Highway code stopping distances are based on old-technology tyres; drum brakes and ignore brake assist technology and traction control/ABS.
With modern tyres, emergency brake assist, traction control, disc brakes and other modern paraphernalia, the Highway Code significantly over-estimates stopping distances in the dry. Furthermore, the very best tyres have comparable stopping power in the wet as in the dry.
In short, given the situation as described, there should have been plenty of time to come to a safe, controlled stop with no risk of rear-ending.
If the collision was unavoidable, then one has to conclude that the situation may not have been as described in the OP
But to be fair to the OP, there was surface water and the incident took place around dawn.
This is probably the worst conditions. A good driver would compensate for the increased danger by driving slower.
Although the highway code gives a stopping distance of 40ft for dry conditions at 20 mph, the reality is that tyre/road grip is less good in the wet.
A rough rule of thumb would be to double the stopping distance (thinking distance remains the same), so overall stopping distance should have been around 60ft (18m).
The OP says the hazard was around 50m beyond the blind bend.
This should have given ample time to slow down or stop in a safe and controlled manner, even with a tailgater behind.
Unless the actual speed was closer to 30mph, in which case the theoretical stopping distance in the wet would be around 40m.
To achieve that deceleration, one would really have to hit the brakes quite hard, and yes, there might be a risk of a tail-gating driver failing to respond in time, possibly resulting in a rear-end impact.
In fact, the Highway code stopping distances are based on old-technology tyres; drum brakes and ignore brake assist technology and traction control/ABS.
With modern tyres, emergency brake assist, traction control, disc brakes and other modern paraphernalia, the Highway Code significantly over-estimates stopping distances in the dry. Furthermore, the very best tyres have comparable stopping power in the wet as in the dry.
In short, given the situation as described, there should have been plenty of time to come to a safe, controlled stop with no risk of rear-ending.
If the collision was unavoidable, then one has to conclude that the situation may not have been as described in the OP
A driver would be expected to stop or go round a legally parked car-motorcycle for example which would also be about the same size as a bin- but at night time they would have some sort of light reflector so they can be seen- so maybe any bins should have a reflector on- just as a skip would outside daylight hours
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
News6 mins ago
Film, Media & TV9 mins ago
ChatterBank16 mins ago
