after just seeing the photo of her on her 18th birthday on Richard & Judy, what does everyone think, do you think she was made to wear it? im not sure, i think maybe it was 50/50. for your 18th bday party, i would have thought you would want to wear something less formal!
Felt a bit sorry for fergie, richard and judy had a right go. at the end of the day it was a fancy dress party and thats what they wore, i didn't see then having a go at Wills for having a fancy dress party for his 21st, it was just richard and judy having a go for the sake of it and this from a man who has a conviction for shop lifting.
I PMSL @ the photo.Those kids are so lucky that they have parents who have remained parents BUT as much as she adores her girls and I actually like her as well -they will curl up and die when they see the matching minnie mouse type outfits she has persisted with in later life.- lol
BTW -She had a section on that date because she wanted her daughter to have that DOB and time of birth -absolute FACT - not urban myth.
google it -although I honestly remember the 'furore' when she was born.It was so obvious and they later admitted it was selective -but was it not ht e the QM's birthday or QV's birthdayHonest pippa -take it from me it was deliberate !!!
I have googled, Drisgirl ~ all I could find was the fact that both pregnancies were straighforward, although Eugenie was delivered by C secion due to her being a breech baby.
I won't deny the fact that Beatrices date of birth may well have been planned ahead, however Fergie could have had an induction/natural birth on that day rather than a C section :o)
Get ya Pippa - the baby for whatever reason was deliberately born on 8.8.88.I believe it was an induction and have no reason to doubt that.Cheers Bud !!!!