ChatterBank26 mins ago
Whats This About?
1 Answers
Answers
Yet more conspiracy theories. Melanie Shaw was convicted (by the unanimous decision of the jury at Nottingham Crown Court) on 11 December 2014 of "arson, being reckless as to whether life was endangered" and of "criminal damage" (to the same property, 4 months after the arson incident). That followed her setting fire to a shed (causing a family of five to...
22:24 Wed 04th Jul 2018
Yet more conspiracy theories.
Melanie Shaw was convicted (by the unanimous decision of the jury at Nottingham Crown Court) on 11 December 2014 of "arson, being reckless as to whether life was endangered" and of "criminal damage" (to the same property, 4 months after the arson incident). That followed her setting fire to a shed (causing a family of five to flee their home) and then later throwing paint at their house.
While awaiting trial she was held on remand at HMP Peterborough, where a psychiatrist assessed her as suffering from a mental illness. As a result of that assessment, the judge at her trial decided not to pass a custodial sentence.
Ms Shaw has alleged that children were murdered at Beechwood Community Home in Mapperley, Nottinghamshire. There's no doubt at all that abuse did take place there (e.g. https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-nott inghams hire-35 883737 ) but police investigations have found no evidence to substantiate her claims. Further, since she has been assessed as being 'delusional', there have to be major question marks about her credibility as a witness.
When Melanie Shaw was convicted of arson and criminal damage she was given a 5-year restraining order, banning her from contacting her victims or going to their address. The fact that she has now been imprisoned suggests to me that she broke that order and that the subsequent court case was held 'in camera' to prevent her delusional accusations against innocent people from entering the public domain.
However the people behind the online newspaper UK Column (feaured in your video) see conspiracies everywhere and would prefer to believe that 'the establishment' in general, and Thereas May in particular, are determined to cover up child murders.
The guy wearing a tie in your video is Brian Gerrish, who certainly seems to have some odd views
https:/ /ration alwiki. org/wik i/Brian _Gerris h
and is far from trusted by some people
http:// www.cha rliefou lkes.co .uk/tru th/bria n-gerri sh-disi nformat ion-age nt.html
I'll leave it to you to decide where the truth is most likely to be.
Melanie Shaw was convicted (by the unanimous decision of the jury at Nottingham Crown Court) on 11 December 2014 of "arson, being reckless as to whether life was endangered" and of "criminal damage" (to the same property, 4 months after the arson incident). That followed her setting fire to a shed (causing a family of five to flee their home) and then later throwing paint at their house.
While awaiting trial she was held on remand at HMP Peterborough, where a psychiatrist assessed her as suffering from a mental illness. As a result of that assessment, the judge at her trial decided not to pass a custodial sentence.
Ms Shaw has alleged that children were murdered at Beechwood Community Home in Mapperley, Nottinghamshire. There's no doubt at all that abuse did take place there (e.g. https:/
When Melanie Shaw was convicted of arson and criminal damage she was given a 5-year restraining order, banning her from contacting her victims or going to their address. The fact that she has now been imprisoned suggests to me that she broke that order and that the subsequent court case was held 'in camera' to prevent her delusional accusations against innocent people from entering the public domain.
However the people behind the online newspaper UK Column (feaured in your video) see conspiracies everywhere and would prefer to believe that 'the establishment' in general, and Thereas May in particular, are determined to cover up child murders.
The guy wearing a tie in your video is Brian Gerrish, who certainly seems to have some odd views
https:/
and is far from trusted by some people
http://
I'll leave it to you to decide where the truth is most likely to be.