News0 min ago
Something From Nothing
59 Answers
I find this assertion totally ludicrous.
The bible has it totally right. "In the beginning." It took centuries for us to accept that here was a beginning, preferring a perpetual universe.
As atheists, you don't like the possibility of a Creator God.
No problem - for Him.
Not met Him today so do t believe?
Your problem not His.
Not preaching to,you, just giving you facts.
Lots of unbelievers.
Think there is safety in numbers?
Sadly, go for it.
The bible has it totally right. "In the beginning." It took centuries for us to accept that here was a beginning, preferring a perpetual universe.
As atheists, you don't like the possibility of a Creator God.
No problem - for Him.
Not met Him today so do t believe?
Your problem not His.
Not preaching to,you, just giving you facts.
Lots of unbelievers.
Think there is safety in numbers?
Sadly, go for it.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Jim, //It's because you will find, again and again, that every time you write down a theory for the structure of the Universe, or for the behaviour of gravity, that theory will almost force you to concede the idea that nothing -- in the most literal sense -- is an impossible state to achieve//
That's the basis of Theland's argument.
That's the basis of Theland's argument.
Perhaps we just need to accept that the origin of the universe is something we'll never understand. It is what it is, and here we all are.
I personally do not find it remotely upsetting that there's no purpose or controlling intelligence behind it all. In fact it makes it all the more wondrous and fascinating.
I'm off down the pub later.
I personally do not find it remotely upsetting that there's no purpose or controlling intelligence behind it all. In fact it makes it all the more wondrous and fascinating.
I'm off down the pub later.
naomi; Thanks. 'In simple terms, he believes that the singularity in Einstein's field equation at the Big Bang is only an apparent singularity, similar to the well-known apparent singularity at the event horizon of a black hole. The latter singularity can be removed by a change of coordinate system, and he, (Penrose) proposes a different change of coordinate system that will remove the singularity at the big bang. One implication of this is that the major events at the Big Bang can be understood without unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics, and therefore we are not necessarily constrained by the Wheeler–DeWitt equation, which disrupts time. Alternatively, one can use the Einstein–Maxwell–Dirac equations.'
I really couldn't have put it better myself. :0)
I really couldn't have put it better myself. :0)
https:/ /i.pini mg.com/ origina ls/ea/6 f/ec/ea 6fec843 1e572a3 39519a3 1879f1a 1c.jpg
Penrose illustrates his theory with my avatar, courtesy of M C Escher.
He suggests the beginning and end consist entirely of photons.
God said, "Let there be light."
Penrose illustrates his theory with my avatar, courtesy of M C Escher.
He suggests the beginning and end consist entirely of photons.
God said, "Let there be light."