Kkk For Corbyn

[vetuste_ennemi]

KKK leader David Duke (who he? Ed) endorses Jeremy Corbyn on "Anti-semitism".

How? Possibly by twitter, cheep or cluck. Who knows?

Responsible journalist presenting Sky's Press Preview makes all the obvious points:

"You can't choose those who 'support' a particular position of yours".

"Of course Jeremy Corbyn condemns the KKK".

"To use the David Duke 'endorsement' to attack Corbyn is a smear campaign".

The concept of guilt by association is better than its reputation: judge a man by the company he keeps makes some kind of sense - agreed? But Corbyn and Duke didn't swap Christmas cards, so all the above comments are pertinent and fair.

My question is, if guilt (by the most tenuous)association is unfair in Corbyn's case why was exactly this used as prime evidence in the attack on Trump?

[vetuste_ennemi]

I don't get that, Jim. I thought you were a research scientist.

Isn't that where the Nobel prizes are?

Nothing wrong, however, with helping the young to think for themselves and to be curious about the amazing world we live in.

It's naughty of me to quote "those who can do...".

[jim360]

Well, perhaps I will change my mind yet -- but who knows, maybe your naughty quote is sort of accurate? :P

[-Talbot-]

I read the OP I have read the replies


Who is this thread primarily about?

[-Talbot-]

Ignore me I'm issed

[vetuste_ennemi]

David Duke (who he? Ed) endorsed Trump.

Therefore Trump wears a white outfit with a hood and hangs n****s from trees.

[vetuste_ennemi]

Here's a song:

[naomi24]

Haha! This thread should be filed under Comedy Gold. Oh, what a tangled web you weave, Jim. ;o)

[jim360]

I look forward to the day when you actually have something useful to say, N.

[naomi24]

Dig on, Jim. :o)

[youngmafbog]

And equally I'm looking forward to the day you write a clear and concise post without any spin jim.