Film, Media & TV1 min ago
Is Ww2 Next.?
We’ve had Northern Ireland, now Cyprus, which bit of the Second World War will they be investigating next.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-60 49345/F ury-Gov ernment -lawyer s-probe -allega tions-w rongdoi ng-Brit ain-Cyp rus-195 0s.html
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// Because this is clearly compensation orientated,//
then you do a civil case - duuh. - compo is not always the outcome of criminal - wivda Bloody Sunday inquiry ( £150m) I suggested just giving £10m to each beareaved family
and was met with a chorus of 'oh that isnt the point at all - the truth is!" my arriss
then you do a civil case - duuh. - compo is not always the outcome of criminal - wivda Bloody Sunday inquiry ( £150m) I suggested just giving £10m to each beareaved family
and was met with a chorus of 'oh that isnt the point at all - the truth is!" my arriss
// How will they prove anything ? .....(w)
under no circumstances are the British allowed to attack the enemy! PMSL! // (and 3T goes on possing himself over the floor, carpets etc)
very difficult in practice - and the rules in english law are that if there is no defendant then the case doesnt go forward - recently over-ruled in a large part
in a work related disciplinary, the accuser declined to turn up coz he was so frightened etc and so the accusations lay on the table .... was the defendant worker required to disprove them - and if he didnt would be get fired ? God we had fun over that one.
free-tee goes on possing himself because it is so funny
criminal investigations should not be wasted on those where the perp is dead because it just such a waste of time ....
under no circumstances are the British allowed to attack the enemy! PMSL! // (and 3T goes on possing himself over the floor, carpets etc)
very difficult in practice - and the rules in english law are that if there is no defendant then the case doesnt go forward - recently over-ruled in a large part
in a work related disciplinary, the accuser declined to turn up coz he was so frightened etc and so the accusations lay on the table .... was the defendant worker required to disprove them - and if he didnt would be get fired ? God we had fun over that one.
free-tee goes on possing himself because it is so funny
criminal investigations should not be wasted on those where the perp is dead because it just such a waste of time ....