News1 min ago
Brexiteer Plot To Oust May By October And Install David Davis As ‘Interim’ Pm
Would this be the most sensible option for the immediate future?
https:/
https:/
Answers
1 to 20 of 20
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So the Tories are just going to ‘oust’ their leader and impose David Davis without any ejection, because of course he would be the natural unifying candidate? And this will simply be waved through by MPs allowing a man who was plainly clueless in negotiations with the EU somehow to make it all right?
In the real world that would mean the Tory party splitting.
It verily is the silly season.
In the real world that would mean the Tory party splitting.
It verily is the silly season.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Honestly I think we're all quite surprised that May has survived this long. I thought she would be out ages ago - and indeed so did plenty of commentators. Every time it looks like she is done for, she seems to claw it back. Perhaps we've been underestimating her political ambition.
The hardline Brexiteers of the ERG don't command nearly enough parliamentary support to win a Tory leadership election. That's the bind they're in: they have enough to call one, but not win it. So they can keep threatening to oust her - and maybe even succeed - only to have their own candidate lose to another Remainer. Once they've done it, their bolt is shot and their influence is pretty much done.
So the bizarre political logic of the situation is that their best strategy is to keep threatening to do it but never actually do it - and hope that May's personal desire to cling on is strong enough to get concessions.
The hardline Brexiteers of the ERG don't command nearly enough parliamentary support to win a Tory leadership election. That's the bind they're in: they have enough to call one, but not win it. So they can keep threatening to oust her - and maybe even succeed - only to have their own candidate lose to another Remainer. Once they've done it, their bolt is shot and their influence is pretty much done.
So the bizarre political logic of the situation is that their best strategy is to keep threatening to do it but never actually do it - and hope that May's personal desire to cling on is strong enough to get concessions.
It was always likely Theresa May would survive for the reasons kromo states. The referendum led to a state of affairs where a small number of extreme Brexiters in parliament thought they could bully their way to disaster backed by the result. But in reality their do not have they power to back up their threats nor, it is plain. do they have any sort of mandate from the public either.
Breitbart.com) is a far-right syndicated American news, opinion and commentary website. Its journalists are widely considered to be ideologically driven, and some of its content has been called misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by liberals and many traditional conservatives alike. The site has published a number of falsehoods, conspiracy theories, and intentionally misleading stories.
Remainers are in the majority in the Parliamentary Conservative Party, so they will not lose a vote on Mays position as PM. Even if by some quirk she was weakened and forced to go, the MPs would not then elect an hard brexiteer, especially one as discreditted as Davis, the would elect another Remainer.
Remainers are in the majority in the Parliamentary Conservative Party, so they will not lose a vote on Mays position as PM. Even if by some quirk she was weakened and forced to go, the MPs would not then elect an hard brexiteer, especially one as discreditted as Davis, the would elect another Remainer.
I hate seeing the BBC blatantly and continuingly acting as an arm of the leftist "progressive" movement, manipulating the populace with propaganda and false unproven ideology. Every day I look at the BBC homepage, but it's now nothing more than a liberal mouthpiece, spewing bile against the US President, relentlessly advancing the LGBT and Islaimist agenda, and not reporting on news that doesn't fir their very narrow politically-correct criteria.
On the point about David Davis, he's not a leader in any way, shape or form, and if his track record on Brexit is anything to go by isn't exactly mustard at getting things done. He may be okay as a caretaker, but that would be his limit.
On the point about David Davis, he's not a leader in any way, shape or form, and if his track record on Brexit is anything to go by isn't exactly mustard at getting things done. He may be okay as a caretaker, but that would be his limit.
1 to 20 of 20
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.