Donate SIGN UP

What Else Has He Not Quite Understood?

Avatar Image
spathiphyllum | 09:40 Fri 09th Nov 2018 | News
60 Answers
"Brexit secretary Dominic Raab says he ‘hadn’t quite understood’ importance of Dover-Calais crossing"


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-dominic-raab-trade-eu-france-calais-dover-economy-finance-deal-a8624036.html
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 60rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by spathiphyllum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It clearly doesn't have to be a hard border. Trade can be monitored/recorded at source and destination, traffic can flow without hinderance as it does now. Makes sense to monitor it though.
Question Author
Well surely that defeats half the point of brexit? You know.. controlling our own borders? If there is a weak point in Ireland that will get abused.
I'm disappointed. I was thinking Raab was a bit more on top of his brief than Davis had been (and as any five-year-old would be). It seems not; he's just another incompetent.
For the umpteen time; we control by CHOOSING to have the border open. It's our choice, our control. That is the whole point. I don't understand why that isn't instinctively understood, but the question crops up again and again.
Question Author
That's not what 'we' want though, OG....
Question Author
May wants a hard boarder in Ireland, she just wants the EU to implement it.
"The EU never has needed to implement a hard border but threatens to do so for two reasons."

The EU has no authority to implement and police the border on the island of Ireland. Since neither the UK nor Ireland has any intention whatsoever of doing so, the question that needs asking (and one MP did so in Parliament three or four weeks ago but received no reply) is "Who exactly is going to implement and police the border?"

The border question has simply been weaponised by the EU in an attempt to force us to remain in a customs union with them. Among their biggest fears of Brexit (and, despite assertions to the contrary, they have quite a few) is that we become globally competitive in a way that we never can whilst we are members and that we undercut the members of their protectionist racket. Unfortunately our spineless government has acquiesced to their every demand. So eager are they for the UK to remain as "quasi-members" of the UK that their powers of reasoning seem to have flown out of the window.
"Well surely that defeats half the point of brexit? You know.. controlling our own borders? If there is a weak point in Ireland that will get abused."

Not for the first time, spathi, you entirely fail to grasp the situation. There has been no effective border in Ireland since The Irish Free State seceded from the United Kingdom in 1922. It has been the choice of the UK and Irish governments to continue that arrangement (although there have been some minor changes since 1997 enabling selective border checks to be undertaken if necessary). This agreement has nothing to do with the EU and in fact bestows far greater rights on UK and Irish citizens to live and work in either country than the EU's freedom of movement rules do.

There has never been a problem with either migration or smuggling of goods between the two (principally because no effective border exists). Even more than that, each country has separate tax and excise regimes and these are managed perfectly well despite the open border. So there is no "weak point" in Ireland that stands at risk of being abused after Brexit. The UK electorate's principle issue with immigration is of the uncontrolled type that is currently evident across the EU. Since Ireland is not a Schengen member it imposes border controls on arrivals from mainland Europe and there is no large scale problem with illegal immigration into Ireland (which would enable any people landing there to freely cross into the UK). The UK wants to regain control of its borders as it sees fit. And it sees fit to allow unrestricted transit of both goods and people across the Irish border.
"The EU has no authority to implement and police the border on the island of Ireland."

They will apply pressure to the RoI to do it for them or face consequences. Same result.
It may not be what you want spath, but I'm sure most in the UK and RoI would compromise on that. It remains open, but by national choice either side of the border.
Answer is simple.

We take the moral high ground and leave our side open, the EU cannot dictate to us if we have left much as they would like to.

If they close their side then the whole World will see them for what they are, if they haven't seen already.
"They will apply pressure to the RoI to do it for them or face consequences. Same result."

Good luck to the EU with that. And good luck to Ireland if they are foolish enough to acquiesce. It is widely accepted that without huge resources enforcement of a border in Ireland is practically impossible. Ireland does not have such huge resources and would be unwilling to expend them anyway.

So overawed are all parties by the ideological intransigence of the EU that they have all lost sight of the fact that it is supposed to be there to facilitate its citizens' lives. Their bluff should be called but nobody is willing to do so.
a bit of a heart -sink moment really:

o yeah I see - the ships laden with goods ply their trade beteween Callis and Dover - didnt see that before

voice off - aye there's the rub ....
( just sticking a bit of shakespeare in - I am sure it wasnt really like that)
"Answer is simple," we stay in the EU.
Question Author
ROI will stay in the EU, no? Where as Northan ireland will leave, with the rest of the UK?
well narn Ireland voted to stay. they can cede to the republic, no?
(cue the sound of the rev Ian Paisley rotating in his coffin...…..)
"well narn Ireland voted to stay. they can cede to the republic, no?"

Indeed mush. The requirements of 1.8m people (of whom only 440,000 voted to remain) cannot override the democratic will expressed by more than 17 million people. Any notion that the Irish border issue can thwart the prospect of a proper Brexit is simply scandalous.
If they're daft enough to want to trigger bloodshed in their homeland they can opt to secede. Everyone else in the UK is trying everything to avoid an outbreak of violence though, barring any inane suggestions such as allowing minorities to dictate to the nation and keep us under the thumb of a mainly foreign power block.
"...barring any inane suggestions such as allowing minorities to dictate to the nation and keep us under the thumb of a mainly foreign power block."

But this is exactly what this is about, OG. The minorities are dictating what should happen because, without the threat of a return to violence all that should happen is that the UK should say that we are imposing no border in Ireland but if you [the EU or Ireland] want to do so, feel free.
It's exactly what we're avoiding.

Anyway this has strayed miles from Dover.

41 to 60 of 60rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

What Else Has He Not Quite Understood?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.