ChatterBank3 mins ago
Microfinance
16 Answers
Microfinance - should I listen to the criticisms of microfinance which seem to centre around the argument that the lenders charge too high an interest rate and the recipients receive no real benefit? Or should I ignore the moaners and carry on helping to fund (in my case) Lend With Care?
Every decent charity seems to spawn any number of critics who know why we shouldn’t give.
Every decent charity seems to spawn any number of critics who know why we shouldn’t give.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bainbrig. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I guess you have to do your sums, as with any other finance deal. Borrowers get access to finance they wouldn't normally get, and they pay for the privilege, but whether it's worth it is something only they can assess. And how well they do their sums may affect whether they receive real benefit or not.
Tough one, no real right answer.
Tough one, no real right answer.
Came to prominence in the 70s in Bangladesh. The Grameen (village) bank lent tiny sums (a dollar or two) to poor women to help their very small businesses survive, repaid at equally very small amounts.
The Grameen Bank grew huge and stopped taking deposits quite a few years ago. LendWithCare does a similar job, lending hundreds, occasionally thousands, of pounds, to what they term ‘entrepreneurs’ in poorer countries. They charge interest, but say it is at low local levels.
I have put a lot of money into Lend over the years, every penny of which has been repaid, on time.
The Grameen Bank grew huge and stopped taking deposits quite a few years ago. LendWithCare does a similar job, lending hundreds, occasionally thousands, of pounds, to what they term ‘entrepreneurs’ in poorer countries. They charge interest, but say it is at low local levels.
I have put a lot of money into Lend over the years, every penny of which has been repaid, on time.
Maybe so. I’ve been (mildly) successful in many ways, but there are few things I’m 100% certain of anymore, not even politics. I question my beliefs, my motives, my intentions - sometimes this self-questioning leads me back to where I started, but certainly not always.
You need totally certain people sometimes (Churchill in 1939 for example) but I’d argue that Churchill wasn’t a great peacetime leader because he WAS too certain of his position. There are times when you need a Mandela instead.
You need totally certain people sometimes (Churchill in 1939 for example) but I’d argue that Churchill wasn’t a great peacetime leader because he WAS too certain of his position. There are times when you need a Mandela instead.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.