Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Ivf On The Nhs
170 Answers
Another post on population growth got me thinking about this. The NHS is already stretched to capacity and infertility is not a life threatening illness. IMO no one has the "right" to have a child and I don't see why NHS resources should be spent on IVF,
Your thoughts?
Your thoughts?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mrs_overall. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I've read almost all these answers, and nobody seems to have pointed out that some forms of infertility treatment can actually produce a child who himself would be infertile. If a sperm is injected because a man has feeble sperm, a resultant boy will probably have exactly the same problem. You wouldn't be solving the problem so much as extending it. This sort of fertility assistance should definitely be refused.
-- answer removed --