Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 25 of 25rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Avatar Image
If "the right to free speech" is to mean anything, it must always encompass "the right to offend".
17:50 Thu 22nd Aug 2019
If there were two videos of the same incident, then more than one person filmed it. They would be at slightly different angles and different quality and techniques. The first job of the Police should have been to find both people who filmed the fire and verify who took the one that ended up on YouTube, and caused all the offence.
The Police did not do that, and instead prosecuted only one man, knowing that there was a distinct possibility that his film was not the one on YouTube. Incompetence or dishonesty? Either way, not how the police should behave.
//Is it nowadays considered to be a religious hate-crime to burn a effigy of Guy Fawkes?:)//

No. No it isn't.
"If "the right to free speech" is to mean anything, it must always encompass "the right to offend".

You can't "offend" .....a person chooses whether to take or be offended...
^
take offence or be offended
Gromit - // A victory against incompetence. //

I think you mean a victory for incompetence.

21 to 25 of 25rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Grenfell Model Man Not Guilty

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.