Technology1 min ago
Cure for HIV
12 Answers
Answers
1 to 12 of 12
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by smilingcrow. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Smilingcrow HIV costs thousnads of lives, not to mention millions of pounds, every year.
If there was any chance of a cure, why do you think there was no publicity? Given that every cancer break through is reported in deep detail, do you not think that a HIV break through would warrent some dialogue? Especilayy one thats over 20 years old.
Snake oil salesmen still exist to prey on the desperate.
If there was any chance of a cure, why do you think there was no publicity? Given that every cancer break through is reported in deep detail, do you not think that a HIV break through would warrent some dialogue? Especilayy one thats over 20 years old.
Snake oil salesmen still exist to prey on the desperate.
No, its not true.
The described method of inactivation lacks credibility
Such a potential cure would garner massive scientific interest, unyet the only publications since 1991 have been 3 places, 2 of which is correspondence / letters, the other is publication of an article in an un peer -reviewed journal.
Lack of peer review
Lack of data showing the experimental method, number of samples etc
Lack of proof of concept
A range of untruths about patents being offered as "facts". Length of time to obtain a patent is meaningless. The award of a patent does not in itself offer any proof of concept.
Anytime you see offered so called miracle cures, offered by famous "inventors", with no proof beyond anecdote,assertions of a suppressive conspiracy,experimental vagueness, rhetorical hyperbole and a couple of references on the internet, you should be extremely sceptical of any potential benefit.
It remains an unevidenced, highly dubious treatment protocol, and for that reason is dangerous.
The described method of inactivation lacks credibility
Such a potential cure would garner massive scientific interest, unyet the only publications since 1991 have been 3 places, 2 of which is correspondence / letters, the other is publication of an article in an un peer -reviewed journal.
Lack of peer review
Lack of data showing the experimental method, number of samples etc
Lack of proof of concept
A range of untruths about patents being offered as "facts". Length of time to obtain a patent is meaningless. The award of a patent does not in itself offer any proof of concept.
Anytime you see offered so called miracle cures, offered by famous "inventors", with no proof beyond anecdote,assertions of a suppressive conspiracy,experimental vagueness, rhetorical hyperbole and a couple of references on the internet, you should be extremely sceptical of any potential benefit.
It remains an unevidenced, highly dubious treatment protocol, and for that reason is dangerous.
-- answer removed --
1 to 12 of 12
Latest Posts
Have You Got Led Strip Lights?
Home & Garden6 mins ago
Crosswords8 mins ago
Reform Gaining Huge Numbers Of Votes...
News9 mins ago
ChatterBank20 mins ago
