Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Please Don't Go.......
16 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/e lection -2019-5 0413638
Looks like desperation from the EUSSR. So terrified are they that, as usual, we show Europe the way.
Looks like desperation from the EUSSR. So terrified are they that, as usual, we show Europe the way.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Remember when everybody screamed blue murder when the Don voiced an opinion on the Brexit farce? Accusing him of interfering in our democratic process blahh, blahh, blahh. Tusk makes a direct appeal to thwart a democratic vote and not a peep. Indeed the Beep Beep See decides to give in "front page" status and a tacit approval. Funny old World.
Well there's an admission. Honesty and Frankness does not sit well on the EU shoulders. Just a puppet who has his strings pulled. Careful Tusk . You still have a whopping pension to consider. Hopefully we will not be contributing to it for long.
//He acknowledged this in his speech, adding his remarks were "something I wouldn't have dared to say a few months ago, as I could be fired for being too frank". //
//He acknowledged this in his speech, adding his remarks were "something I wouldn't have dared to say a few months ago, as I could be fired for being too frank". //
We probably won't get an answer but I believe Canary suggests the referendum wasn't democratic because of overspending by the Leave campaign and misleading information being presented to the electorate.
The "overspending" claim (which was upheld) neglected to include the £9m (which, at 30p a pop was almost certainly an underestimate) spent by the government sending a leaflet to every address in the country headed "Why the government believes that voting to remain in the European Union is the best decision for the UK". Canary is certainly right about misleading information. That very leaflet said:
"This is your decision. The government will implement what you decide". Note:
- Nothing about "deals".
- Nothing about a second "confirmatory" referendum.
- Nothing about "only if it does not cause too much trouble."
If that wasn't misleading I don't know what was.
The "overspending" claim (which was upheld) neglected to include the £9m (which, at 30p a pop was almost certainly an underestimate) spent by the government sending a leaflet to every address in the country headed "Why the government believes that voting to remain in the European Union is the best decision for the UK". Canary is certainly right about misleading information. That very leaflet said:
"This is your decision. The government will implement what you decide". Note:
- Nothing about "deals".
- Nothing about a second "confirmatory" referendum.
- Nothing about "only if it does not cause too much trouble."
If that wasn't misleading I don't know what was.